This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
HB1304: requiring workers' compensation to cover prophylactic treatment for critical exposure.
Bill details
Version history, amendments, and roll-call votes were not present in the imported local bill data.
Sponsors
- Cahill House · Rock 17
- Doucette House · Rock 8
- Stephen C. Pearson House · Rock 6
- Jeffrey Goley House · Hills 8
- Patrick Abrami House · Rock 19
- O’Brien House · Hills 36
- Fuller Clark Senate · Dist 21
Topics
Official links
HB 1304-FN - AS INTRODUCED
2020 SESSION
20-2195
01/05
HOUSE BILL 1304-FN
AN ACT requiring workers' compensation to cover prophylactic treatment for critical exposure.
ANALYSIS
This bill clarifies the term "critical exposure" for the purpose of the workers' compensation law.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
20-2195
01/05
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty
AN ACT requiring workers' compensation to cover prophylactic treatment for critical exposure.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 Workers' Compensation; Definitions. RSA 281-A:2, I-e is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
I-e. "Critical exposure" means contact of an employee's ruptured or broken skin or mucous membranes, including the eyes or mouth, with a person's blood or body fluids. Testing and treatment shall be determined by the medical provider taking into account the physical examination and incident details provided by the patient.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2021.
LBAO
20-2195
11/13/19
HB 1304-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
AN ACT requiring workers' compensation to cover prophylactic treatment for critical exposure.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ X ] County [ X ] Local [ ] None
Estimated Increase / (Decrease)
STATE:
FY 2020
FY 2021
FY 2022
FY 2023
Appropriation
$0
$0
$0
$0
Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0
Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
Funding Source:
[ X ] General [ ] Education [ ] Highway [ ] Other
COUNTY:
Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0
Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
LOCAL:
Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0
Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
Indeterminable Increase
METHODOLOGY:
This bill clarifies the term "critical exposure" for the purpose of workers' compensation law. The Department of Labor indicates the proposed definition of critical exposure would remove the requirement that applicability to tears, saliva and perspiration requires visible contamination with blood and requires that testing and treatment for exposure be determined by the medical provider. The Department does not anticipate the bill would impact state, county or local revenues. The Department assumes there could be increased state, county and local expenditures from added treatment costs as additional exposures would be covered. The Department reports the amount of potential increase is indeterminable as there is no way to credibly quantify the impact on claims, premiums or coverage costs.
The New Hampshire Municipal Association indicates, by expanding the definition of "critical exposure" under the workers' compensation law, the law may require workers' compensation to cover post-exposure treatment in more cases. However, the Association also comments that immediate post-exposure treatment may reduce long-term medical costs. Any increase or decrease in medical costs may affect workers' compensation rates paid by municipalities
The Department of Safety indicates the cost to state, county and local government cannot be determined as the potential number of additional claims is unknown. The Department expects there would be no fiscal impact on state, county or local revenues.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
New Hampshire Municipal Association and Departments of Labor and Safety