This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
HB1594: creating an affirmative defense to violation of a restraining order.
Bill details
Version history, amendments, and roll-call votes were not present in the imported local bill data.
Sponsors
- Robert Forsythe House · Merr 8
- Linda Camarota House · Hills 7
- David C Love House · Rock 6
Topics
Official links
HB 1594-FN - AS INTRODUCED
2020 SESSION
20-2378
04/06
HOUSE BILL 1594-FN
AN ACT creating an affirmative defense to violation of a restraining order.
ANALYSIS
This bill creates an affirmative defense for a defendant who makes contact with the plaintiff at the plaintiff's request.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
20-2378
04/06
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty
AN ACT creating an affirmative defense to violation of a restraining order.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Paragraph; Protection of Persons From Domestic Violence; Violation of Protective Order. Amend RSA 173-B:9 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph:
III-a. It shall be an affirmative defense to the charge that the defendant knowingly violated a protective order issued under RSA 173-B:5, VIII-a by having contact with the plaintiff if the contact is the result of the plaintiff initiating or requesting contact with the defendant.
2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2021.
LBAO
20-2378
12/3/19
HB 1594-FN- FISCAL NOTE
AS INTRODUCED
AN ACT creating an affirmative defense to violation of a restraining order.
FISCAL IMPACT: [ X ] State [ X ] County [ ] Local [ ] None
Estimated Increase / (Decrease)
STATE:
FY 2020
FY 2021
FY 2022
FY 2023
Appropriation
$0
$0
$0
$0
Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0
Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Decrease
Indeterminable Decrease
Indeterminable Decrease
Funding Source:
[ X ] General [ ] Education [ ] Highway [ ] Other
COUNTY:
Revenue
$0
$0
$0
$0
Expenditures
$0
Indeterminable Decrease
Indeterminable Decrease
Indeterminable Decrease
METHODOLOGY:
This bill creates an affirmative defense for violation of a restraining order for a defendant who makes contact with the plaintiff at the plaintiff's request. This bill affects penalties that may have an impact on the New Hampshire judicial and correctional systems. There is no method to determine how many fewer charges would be brought as a result of the changes contained in this bill to determine the fiscal impact on expenditures. However, the entities impacted have provided the potential costs associated with these penalties below.
Judicial Branch
FY 2021
FY 2022
Class B Misdemeanor
$54
$56
Class A Misdemeanor
$77
$79
Simple Criminal Case
$300
$314
Routine Criminal Felony Case
$484
$498
Appeals
Varies
Varies
It should be noted that average case cost estimates for FY 2021 and FY 2022 are based on data that is more than ten years old and does not reflect changes to the courts over that same period of time or the impact these changes may have on processing the various case types.
Department of Corrections
FY 2019 Average Cost of Incarcerating an Individual
$44,400
$44,400
FY 2019 Annual Marginal Cost of a General Population Inmate
$5,071
$5,071
FY 2019 Average Cost of Supervising an Individual on Parole/Probation
$576
$576
NH Association of Counties
County Prosecution Costs
Indeterminable
Indeterminable
Estimated Average Daily Cost of Incarcerating an Individual
$105 to $120
$105 to $120
The Judicial Council indicates affirmative defenses must be proved by the defendant by a preponderance of evidence. The Council assumes the bill would not impact the number of cases brought by the state, but could lead to an increase in acquittals. Therefore, the council does not expect the bill will impact indigent defense expenditures.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
Judicial Branch, Department of Corrections, Judicial Council, and New Hampshire Association of Counties