This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.

HB70: relative to the use of electronic medical records.

Bill details

Version history, amendments, and roll-call votes were not present in the imported local bill data.

Official links

HB 70-FN - AS INTRODUCED

2025 SESSION

25-0057

05/02

HOUSE BILL 70-FN

AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.

SPONSORS: Rep. Nagel, Belk. 6; Rep. Kofalt, Hills. 32

COMMITTEE: Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ANALYSIS

This bill prohibits health carriers from requiring that providers use electronic medical records.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.

Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]

Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.

25-0057

05/02

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty Five

AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 New Section; Electronic Medical Records. Amend RSA 332-I by inserting after section 13 the following new section:

332-I:14 Electronic Medical Records.

I. In this section, "electronic medical record" or "EMR" means a digital version of the paper charts in medical provider’s offices, clinics, and hospitals. EMRs contain notes and information collected by and for the clinicians in that office, clinic, or hospital and are mostly used by providers for diagnosis and treatment.

II. No public or private health carrier governed by state law and when there is no conflict with federal law shall:

(a) Require a health care provider to use an EMR.

(b) Withhold any portion of a provider’s fee for not using an EMR.

(c) Require any specific format of EMR.

(d) Require any specific information in the EMR other than certain demographic information required to identify the patient, the purpose of the health care interaction, and treatment rendered.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.

LBA

25-0057

10/30/24

HB 70-FN- FISCAL NOTE

AS INTRODUCED

AN ACT relative to the use of electronic medical records.

FISCAL IMPACT: This bill does not provide funding, nor does it authorize new positions.









Estimated State Impact





FY 2025

FY 2026

FY 2027

FY 2028





Revenue

$0

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 





Revenue Fund(s)

General Fund





Expenditures*

$0

$0

$0

$0





Funding Source(s)

None





Appropriations*

$0

$0

$0

$0





Funding Source(s)

None





*Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill









Estimated Political Subdivision Impact





FY 2025

FY 2026

FY 2027

FY 2028





County Revenue

$0

$0

$0

$0





County Expenditures

$0

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 





Local Revenue

$0

$0

$0

$0





Local Expenditures

$0

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 

Indeterminable 




METHODOLOGY:

The Insurance Department states this bill adds a new section to RSA 332-I prohibiting public and private health carriers from requiring health care providers meet certain electronic medical record standards. Carriers would be prohibited from requiring use of electronic medical records (EMRs), withholding fees for not using EMR, requiring a specific EMR format, and limiting the specific information in the EMR. 

The Department indicates the use of paper-based records or other non-digital versions of records by providers may lead to inefficiencies that increase administrative handling costs related to transfer of records and medical record audits. As a result, providers might seek higher compensation from health carriers to cover their expenses. Similarly, health carriers may also face increased administrative costs and reduced efficiency. Health carriers may respond by increasing premiums to maintain profitability, which could ultimately lead to higher premium tax revenue. County and local expenditures may be impacted to the extent they pay for health insurance premiums. The financial impact of the bill may vary based on how providers and carriers adjust to the changes, therefore the financial impact of this bill is indeterminable.

The Department of Health and Human Services anticipates that this legislation will not result in any additional fiscal impact to the Department. 

It is assumed that any fiscal impact would occur after FY 2025.

AGENCIES CONTACTED:

Insurance Department and Department of Health and Human Services

Extraction diagnostics

Related law links

RSA references from bill data

  • 332-I · add

    erminable Indeterminable Indeterminable Local Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Expenditures $0 Indeterminable Indeterminable Indeterminable METHODOLOGY: The Insurance Department states this bill adds a new section to RSA 332-I prohibiting public and private health carriers from requiring health care providers meet certain electronic medical record standards. Carriers would be prohibited from requiring use of electronic medical recor

RSAs mentioned by this document