This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
HB1688: expanding the circumstances where the restraint is permitted in schools and treatment facilities and modifying the definition of seclusion.
Bill details
Last sync warning: curl exited 52: curl: (52) Empty reply from server
Version history, amendments, and roll-call votes were not present in the imported local bill data.
Official links
by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 Public Health; Limiting the Use of Child Restraint Practices; Definition of Seclusion Modified. Amend RSA 126-U:1, V-a(b) to read as follows: (b) The term shall not include: the [voluntary] involuntary separation of a child from a stressful environment for the purpose of allowing the child to regain self-control, when such sep
Extraction diagnostics
Related law links
RSA references from bill data
-
126-U:1
· amend
by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 Public Health; Limiting the Use of Child Restraint Practices; Definition of Seclusion Modified. Amend RSA 126-U:1, V-a(b) to read as follows: (b) The term shall not include: the [voluntary] involuntary separation of a child from a stressful environment for the purpose of allowing the child to regain self-control, when such sep
-
126-U:5
· amend
present, if the other elements of this definition are satisfied. 2 Limitation on the Use of Restraint to Emergencies Only; Substantial and Serious Bodily Harm Removed. Amend RSA 126-U:5, I to read as follows: I. Restraint shall only be used in a school or facility to ensure the immediate physical safety of persons when there is [a substantial and] an imminent risk of [serious] bodily harm to the ch