This page is an unofficial LFoD record and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.

Marie Irene Lepage v. Roland L'Heureux

March 30, 1979 - Opinion

Unanimous

Case records

Open case page

Docket: 1978-0292

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
March 30, 1979 Marie Irene Lepage v. Roland L'Heureux Current page Opinion Supreme Court Reporter

Hillsborough

No. 78-292

Marie Irene Lepage v. Roland L’Heureux

March 30, 1979

Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, of Manchester {James Q. Shirley orally), for the plaintiff.

Wiggin & Nourie, of Manchester {James W. Donchess orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion On March 29, 1970, plaintiff was a passenger in a motor vehicle that was involved in an accident while being operated by the defendant in Brockton, Massachusetts. Plaintiff brought suit against the defendant by writ dated August 10, 1976. Defendant moved to dismiss because of the six-year statute of limitations. RSA 508:4. After a hearing, the motion was granted and plaintiffs exception was transferred by Loughlin, C.J.

Plaintiff argues that because defendant was in and out of various hospitals outside the State, those times should be excluded so as to toll the running of the statute. The defendant testified, however, that during the period from the date of the accident to the time of the hearing, he had a residence in this State and that during the time when he was in the hospital in Massachusetts, he returned to his New Hampshire abode on weekends. The evidence supports a finding by the trial court that the defendant had an abode in New Hampshire where service of process could have been made and that there had been no tolling of the statute. In the absence of specific findings, the trial court is presumed to have made all findings necessary to support its decree. Tibbetts v. Tibbetts, 109 N.H. 239, 248 A.2d 75 (1968).

Exceptions overruled.