This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Tanya M. Pardo (2008)
conduct violated the above rules. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attorney Pardo has conceded that her (d) Rule S.4(a). This rule makes it professional misconduct to violate the
objection had been timely filed. the motion to compel based on the false representation that the file, and filing a motion to vacate the superior court order granting been filed in a civil case, placing the backdated objection in the court backdating an objection to a motion to compel discovery that had misrepresentation. Attorney Pardo violated this rule by creating and to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or (c) Rule S.4(c). This rule makes it professional misconduct for a lawyer
compel, when she had not. her employer that she had filed a timely objection to the motion to of representing a client. Attorney Pardo violated this rule by advising false statement of material fact or law to a third person in the course (b) Rule 4.1(a). This rule prohibits a lawyer from knowingly making a
filed. based on the false representation that the objection had been timely to vacate the superior court order granting the motion to compel placing the backdated objection in the court file, and filing a motion a motion to compel discovery that had been filed in a civil case, Pardo violated these rules by creating and backdating an objection to from offering evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. Attorney knowingly making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal and (a) Rule 3.3(a)(1) and Rule 3.3(a)(3). These rules prohibit a lawyer from
the following Rules of Professional Conduct: sanction for the violations. The parties stipulate that Attorney Pardo violated several Rules of Professional Conduct and that disbarment is the appropriate Disbarment in which the parties stipUlated that Attorney Pardo had violated disciplinary counsel, and Attorney Tanya M. Pardo filed a Consent to On September 25, 200S, the Attorney Discipline Office, through
LD-2008-0008, In the Matter of Tanya M. Pardo
ORDER
SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2
File Sherri Kluesener, Supreme Court NH Bar Association x5 Tanya M. Pardo Landya B. McCafferty, Esquire James L. DeHart, Esquire Margaret Neison, Chair Distribution:
ATTEST:
DATE: October 6, 2008
Broderick, C.J., and Dalianis, Galway and Hicks, JJ., concurred.
and prosecution of this matter. expenses incurred by the Professional Conduct Committee in the investigation the practice of law in New Hampshire. Attorney Pardo is hereby assessed all THEREFORE, the court orders that Tanya M. Pardo be disbarred from
court agrees that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case. Having reviewed the notice of charges and the parties' stipulation, the