Mary Notaris (2010)

earlierthan threeyears from the date ofthisorder. She shallbe requiredto prosecutionofthismatter. Mary Notarismay seek readmission to the bar no incurredby the ProfessionalConduct Committee in the investigationand practiceoflaw in New Hampshire. She ishereby assessedallexpenses THEREFORE, the courtordersthatMary Notarisbe disbarredfrom the

disbarment. Accordingly, the courtgrantsthe reliefrequestedby the PCC in the petitionfor courtconcludes thatdisbarment isthe appropriatesanctionin thiscase. answer. In lightofthe natureand severityofAttorney Notaris'misconduct, the The courthas reviewed thepetitionfordisbarment and Attorney Notaris'

recommended sanction. not intendto contestthe petition.She asked the courtto impose the which she statedthatshe did not contestthe allegationsofthe petitionand did Attorney Notarisfiledan answer to the petition,through counsel,in

(4) Rule 8.4(a),by violatingthe Rules of ProfessionalConduct. and misrepresentation;and (3) Rule 8.4(c),by engaging in conduct involvingdishonesty,deceit assertionsto theADO;

alteredpleading,alteringcomputer records,and making false Attorney DisciplineOffice (ADO),includingsubmittingan (2) Rule 8.1(a),by making falsestatementsofmaterialfactto the requestsforinformationfrom clients;

(1) Rule 1.4,by failingto promptly comply with reasonable

Attorney Notarisviolatedthe followingRules of ProfessionalConduct: petitionfordisbarment ofAttorney Mary Notaris. The PCC allegedthat On May 27, 2010, the ProfessionalConduct Committee (PCC) fileda

LD-2010-0008, In the Matter ofMary Notaris

Margaret H. Nelson, Chair James L. Kruse, Esquire Distribution:

DATE: November 10, 2010

Broderick,C.J.,and Dalianis,Duggan, Hicks and Conboy, JJ.,concurred.

otherrequirementsofRule 37(14) priorto readmission. MultistateProfessionalResponsibilityExamination, as well as to satisfythe pass the New Hampshire Bar Examination and successfullycomplete the