Daniel S. Braese (2012)

disciplinein New Hampshire. graveinjusticeor thathismisconductwould warrant substantiallydifferent Braese'smisconduct, the courtdoes not findthatdisbarment would resultin thathe consented to the disbarment. In lightofthe seriousnessofAttorney an opportunityto beheard intheMassachusettsdisciplinaryproceedingsand 37(12)(d)have been met. Itappearsfrom the orderthatAttorneyBraesehad County,thecourtdoes not findthatany of theconditionssetforth in Rule Having reviewedtheorderoftheSupreme JudicialCourt for Suffolk

response to the order. County (Massachusetts)would beunwarranted. AttorneyBraese filed no substantiallysimilartothatimposed by theSupreme JudicialCourt for Suffolk the opportunityto show why the impositionofdisciplineidenticalor with thisprovision,the courtissuedan orderprovidingAttorneyBraese with warrantssubstantiallydifferentdisciplinein New Hampshire. In accordance by thecourtwould resultin graveinjustice;or(3)themisconduct established due process;(2)theimpositionofthesame or substantiallysimilardiscipline lackingin notice oropportunityto beheard as toconstitutea deprivationof that:(1)the procedure followedby thejurisdictionimposing disciplinewas so finds,based on the face ofthe recordfrom which thedisciplineispredicated, courtunlessthe respondentattorneyor the PCC demonstrates,or the court Rule 37(12)(d)providesfortheimpositionofreciprocaldisciplineby the

consentto disbarment in the Supreme JudicialCourt. thaton November 15, 2011, Attorney Braese filed awaiver ofhearingand falsestatementsin FederalHousing Administrationtransactions.Italsostates DistrictCourt forthe DistrictofMassachusetts with bank fraud and making statesthatAttorney Braese was charged by informationin United States prepared by the Massachusetts Board ofBar Overseers filedwith thejudgment County (Massachusetts),disbarringAttorney Daniel S. Braese. A summary ofthe December 8, 2011 judgment ofthe Supreme JudicialCourt forSuffolk On January 4, 2012, theAttorney DisciplineOfficefileda certifiedcopy

LD-2012-0001, In theMatter ofDaniel S. Braese

Margaret H. Nelson, Esq. Alan J.Cronheim, Esq. Thomas V. Trevethick,Esq. Mr. Daniel S. Braese Attorney DisciplineOffice,BD-2011-115 Distribution:

DATE: May 4, 2012

Dalianis,C.J.,and Hicks, Conboy and Lynn, JJ.,concurred.

interestsofAttorney Braese'sclients. courtwhether theappointment ofan attorneyisnecessaryto protectthe On or beforeMay 24, 2012, theAttorney DisciplineOfficeshalladvise the

investigationand prosecutionofthismatter. See Rule 37(19). assessedallexpenses incurredby the ProfessionalConduct Committee in the from the practiceoflaw in New Hampshire. AttorneyBraese ishereby Therefore,the courtordersthatAttorney Daniel S. Braese be disbarred