This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.

David M. Wagner (2012)

File Thomas V. Trevethick, Esq. David M. Wagner, Esq. Attorney Discipline Office Distribution:

Eileen Fox, Clerk ~~

ATI'EST:

DATE: October 1, 2012

Dalianis, C.J., and Hicks, Conboy, Lynn, and Bassett, JJ., concurred.

Conduct Committee in the investigation and prosecution of this matter. Attorney Wagner is hereby assessed all expenses incurred by the Professional David M. Wagner be disbarred from the practice of law in New Hampshire. THEREFORE, in accordance with Rule 37(9)(d), the court orders that

disbarment is the appropriate discipline in this matter. and his failure to respond to this court's order, the court concludes that Considering the seriousness of the crime committed by Attorney Wagner

received. Hampshire Bar Association. No response to the court's order has been mailed to Attorney Wagner at the last address that he provided to the New of this conviction. In accordance with Rule 37(9)(d), the court's order was to show cause by August 24, 2012, why he should not be disbarred as a result Supreme Court Rule 37(9)(b). The court's order also required Attorney Wagner determination that the conviction constitutes a"serious crime," as defined by suspending Attorney Wagner from the practice of law based on its U.S.C ยง 641. On July 25, 2012, the court issued an order immediately pleaded guilty to one count of theft of government funds in violation of 18 filed with this court. The judgment states the Attorney David M. Wagner the Eastern District of Missouri in United States v. David M. Wagner has been A certified copy of the judgment of the United States District Court for

LD-2012-0005, In the Matter of David M. Wagner

ORDER

SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Extraction diagnostics