This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Daniel J. Kelleher (2012)
and prosecution of this matter. See Rule 37(19). expenses incurred by the Professional Conduct Committee in the investigation. practice of law in New Hampshire. Attorney Kelleher is hereby assessed all Therefore, the court orders that Daniel J. Kelleher be disbarred from the
warrant substantially different discipline in New Hampshire. disbarment would result in grave injustice or that his misconduct would seriousness of Attorney Kelleher's misconduct, the court does not find that to be heard in the Massachusetts disciplinary proceedings. In light of the been met. It appears from the order that Attorney Kelleher had an opportunity for Suffolk County, the court does not find that any of these conditions have Having· reviewed the order of the Massachusetts Supreme.'Judicial Court ' warrants substantially different discipline in New Hampshire. by the court would result in grave injustice; or (3) the misconduct established due process; ·(2) the imposition of the same or substantially similar discipline lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as to constitute a dt(privation of that: ( 1) the procedure followed by the jurisdiction imposing discipline was so finds, based on the face of the record from which the discipline is predicated, court unless the respondent attorney or the PCC demonstrates,· or the court Rule 37(12)(d) provides for the imposition of reciprocal discipline by the
warranted. Attorney Kelleher filed no response. unwarranted. The PCC notified the court that it believed that disbarment was imposition of identical or substantially similar discipline would be Conduct Committee (PCC) inform the court if either contended that the Kelleher. It further ordered that Attorney Kelleher and the Professional that a copy of the Massachusetts disciplinary order be served on Attorney In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 37(12)(b), this court ordered
based upon Attorney Kelleher's intentional misuse of client funds. for Suffolk County, disbarring Attorney Daniel J. Kelleher. The discipline was of the November 25, 2011 order of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court On December 7, 2011, the Attorney Discipline Office filed a certified copy
LD-2011-0012, In the Matter of Daniel Joseph Kelleher
ORDER
SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2
File Daniel J. Kelleher, Esq. Thomas V. Trevethick, Esq. Attorney Discipline Office Distribution: .
Eileen Fox, Clerk ~z_fu_p
ATTEST:
DATE: February 10, 2012
possession of any client files or trust accounts. the court whether the appointment of an attorney is necessary to take On or before March 1 2, 2012, the Attorney Discipline Office shall advise