This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Tanner Z. Nolin (2016)
three years on the condition that he meet certain requirements during this should be suspended from the practice of law in New Hampshire for a period of proceedings, t he court accepts the PCC’s recommendation that Attorney Nolin After reviewing the PCC’s recommendation, and the record of the PCC
Conduct. 5. Rule 8.4 (a), making it misconduct to violate the Rules of Professional
deceit; and 4. Rule 8.4(c), making it misc onduct to engage in conduct involving
safeguard client property; 3. Rule 1.15 and Supreme Court Rule 50, requiring a lawyer to
the status of their matters; 2. Rule 1.4, requiring a lawyer to keep clients reasonably informed about
and with diligence; 1. Rule 1.1 and 1.3, requiring a lawyer to represent clients competently
violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: Based on the parties’ stipulation, the PCC found that Attorney Nolin
Nolin nor disciplinary counsel identified any issues for review. legal or factual issues that they wished the court to review. Nei ther Attorney Nolin, along with an order requiring him and disciplinary counsel to identify any Rule 37 (16), a copy of the PCC’s recommendation was served upon Attorney three - year s uspension with conditions. In accordance with Supreme Court and further agreed that the appropriate sanction for these violations was a Nolin agreed that that he had violated several Rules of Professional Conduct and the Att orney Discipline Office’s disciplinary counsel in which Attorney The PCC’s recommendation approved a stipulation executed by Attorney Nolin associated with the investigation and enforcement of the disciplinary matter. of law for a period of three years, with conditions, and order ed to pay the costs recommendation that Attorney Tanner Z. Nolin be suspended from the practice On August 9, 201 6, t he Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) filed a
LD - 201 6 - 00 1 5, In the Matter of Tanner Z. Nolin, Esquire
O R D E R
SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 2
File Tanner Z. Nolin, Esquire David M. Rothstein, Esquire Attorney Discipline Office, 14 - 0 28 Distribution:
Eileen Fox, Clerk ______________________
ATTEST:
DATE: October 21, 201 6
Dalianis, C.J., and Hic ks, Conboy, and Lynn, JJ., concurred.
Discipline Office. of Rule 37(13). A copy of the affidavit shall be sent to the Attorney an affidavit showing that he has fully complied with the requirements (4) Within 30 days of this order, Attorney Nolin shall file with the court
Court Rule 37(13). (3) Attorney Nolin is ordered to comply with the provisions of Supreme
in the investigation and prosecution of this matter. for all costs and expenses incurred by the attorney discipline system ( 2) Attorney Nolin is ordered to reimbur se the Attorney Discipline Office
shall t ake effect August 8, 2016, nunc pro tunc. Monitoring Agreement during the three - year period. The suspension with the conditions set forth in the parties’ stipulation and the LAP Hampshire for a period of three year s, o n the condition that he comply (1) Attorney Tanner Z. Nolin is suspended from the practice of law in New
Assistance Program. Accordingly, the court orders as follows: Monitoring Agreement that Attorney Nolin entered into with the Lawyer period. The conditions are set forth in the parties’ stipulat ion and in a