This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.

Darrin R. Brown (2018)

Page 1 of 2

Lawyer Sanctions (2005) C"Standards"). 60 (2005). The sanction is also in accord with the ABA Standards for Imposing Conner's Case 158 N.H. 299, 303 (2009); Richmond's Case, 152 N.H. 155, 159sanction is in accord with the purposes of attorney discipline. See e.g., The Committee also concluded that a Public Censure is appropriate. Its

Professional Conduct 1.16; 1.7; and 8.4(a), as stipulated. evidence. It further found that Darrin R. Brown's conduct violated Rules of The Committee approved the facts as stipulated by clear and convincing

Disciplinary Matter (attached as Exhibit B). ("the Stipulation," attached as Exhibit A), and the Agreement to Pay Costs of Committee") deliberated the Stipulation as to Facts, Violations and Sanction On April 17, 2018, the Professional Conduct Committee ("the

PUBLIC CENSURE AND ORDER ON COSTS

Brown, Danrin R. advs. Attorney Discipline Office - it 17-010

Margaret R. Kerouac Barbara J. Guay, Legal Assistant Peter G. Beeson * non attorney member Kathleen M. Ames* Martha Van Got Ronald K. Ace* Georges J. Roy* Elaine Holden,* Vice Chair 603-224-5828 ♦ Fax 228-9511 Edward D. Philpot, Jr. Heather E. Krans, Vice Chair Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Mona T. Movafaghi David M. Rothstein, Chair 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102 Caroline K. Leonard

a committee of the attorney discipline system Professional Conduct Committee New Hampshire Supreme Court

Extraction diagnostics