This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Stephen E. Gaige (2019)
Page 1 of 2
Lawyer Sanctions (2005). 60 (2005). The sanction is also in accord with the ABA Standards for Imposing Conner's Case 158 N.H. 299, 303 (2009); Richmond's Case, 152 N.H. 155, 159sanction is in accord with the purposes of attorney discipline. See e.g., The Committee also concluded that a Reprimand is appropriate. Its
Professional Conduct 5.5 and 8.4(a), as stipulated. evidence. It further found that Stephen E. Gaige's conduct violated Rules of The Committee approved the facts as stipulated by clear and convincing
Disciplinaiy Matter (attached as Exhibit B). Reprimand (attached as Exhibit A), and the Agreement to Pay Costs of Committee") deliberated the Stipulation as to Facts, Violations and Sanction: On September 17, 2019, the Professional Conduct Committee ("the
REPRIMAND AND ORDER ON COSTS
Gaige, Stephen E. advs. Attorney Discipline Office - it 19-016
Barbara J. Guay, Legal Assistant Richard C. Guerricro, Jr. ♦ non attorney member Peter G. Beeson Martha Van Got Kathleen M. Ames* Georges J. Roy* Ronald K. Acc* 603-224-5828 ♦ Fax 228-9511 Mona T. Movafaghi Elaine Holden,* Vice Chair Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Caroline K. Leonard Heather E. Krans, Vice Chair 4 ChcncM Drive, Suite 102 Margaret R. Kcrouac David M. Rothstein, Chair
a committee of the attorney discipline system Professional Conduct Committee New Hampshire Supreme Court