This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Christopher W. Keenan (2019)
Page 1 of 2
Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (2005) {"'Standards"), 159-60 (2005). The sanction is also in accord with the ABA Standards for Conner^s Case, 158 N.H. 299, 303 (2009); Richmond's Case, 152 N.H. 155, sanction is in accord with the purposes of attorney discipline. See e.g., The Committee also concluded that a Reprimand is appropriate. Its
of Professional Conduct 1.15 and 8.4(a), and Sup. Ct. R. 50. as stipulated. evidence. It further found that Christopher W. Keenan*s conduct violated Rules The Committee approved the facts as stipulated by clecu* and convincing
Disciplinaiy Matter (attached as Exhibit B). ("the Stipulation." attached as Exhibit A), and the Agreement to Pay Costs of Committee") deliberated the Stipulation as to Facts, Violations and Sanction On December 10. 2019, the Professional Conduct Committee ("the
REPRIMAND AND ORDER ON COSTS
Keenan, Christopher W, advs. Attorney Discipline Office - U18-029
Richard C. Gucrriero, Jr. Barbara J. Guay, Legal Assistant Peter G. Bceson ♦ non attorney member Kathleen M. Ames* Martha Van Got Ronald K. Ace* Georges J. Roy* Elaine Holden,* Vice Chair 603-224-5828 ♦ Fax 228-9511 Mona T. Movafaghi Heather E. Krans, Vice Chair Concord, New Hampshire 0.3301 Caroline K. Leonard David M. Rothstcin, Chair 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102 Margaret R. Kerouac
a committee of the attorney discipline system Professional Conduct Committee New Hampshire Supreme Court