This page is an unofficial mirror and is not legal advice. Verify the document against the official source before relying on it.
Brooks R. Siegel (2021)
NEw HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE
a committee of the attorney discipline system David M. Rothstein, Chair Heather E. Krans, Vice Chair Elaine Holden, * Vice Chair * non attorney member Barbara J. Guay, Legal Assistant In the Matter of Brooks Richard Siegel, Esquire— LD-2021-0006
PUBLIC CENSURE WITH CONDITIONS
In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 37(12), on August 10, 2021, the New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled that the above captioned reciprocal discipline matter from the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona warrants the issuance of a public censure with a one-year period of probation. The Court remanded the matter to the Professional Conduct Committee (“the Committee”) for the issuance of a public censure. The Arizona Court’s Order states, in part: The admissions in the Agreement constitute grounds for imposing the stipulated sanction. Mr. Siegel was hired in 2018 to represent a client in a Lemon Law matter. Thereafter, Mr. Siegel failed to diligently represent and directly communicate with his client for extended periods of time. He further failed to supervise his non-lawyer associates. Mr. Siegel negligently violated his duty to the client and the profession causing potential harm. The Agreement includes a discussion of the grounds in consultation with the American Bar Association’s Standards For Imposing Lawyer Sanctions. . . . The parties stipulate to reprimand [which is a public censure in this state], one year probation (LOMAP), and Mr. Siegel shall pay of costs totaling $1200.00 within thirty days from the date of this order. Accordingly, the Committee issues a public censure to Brooks Richard Siegel, Esquire, as reciprocal discipline based on the Arizona Court’s Order 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102 www.nhattyreg.org (603) 224-5828 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Fax (603) 228-9511
dated December 15, 2020. The public censure is issued subject to the same conditions Attorney Siegel must complete in conjunction with the Arizona reprimand. The ADO is charged with the responsibility to ensure that those conditions are completed. August 24, 2021 /s/ David M. Rothstein David M. Rothstein Chair cc: Brian R. Moushegian, Deputy General Counsel Brooks Richard Siegel, Esquire
NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE
a committee of the attorney discipline system Stephanie C. Hausman, Chair Caroline K. Leonard, Vice Chair Kathleen M. Ames, * Vice Chair *non-attorney member Barbara J. Guay, Legal Assistant In the Matter of Brooks Richard Siegel — LD-2021-0006 ORDER On August 24, 2021, the Committee issued as reciprocal discipline a Public Censure With Conditions. Deputy General Counsel has indicated that Attorney Siegel has satisfied the terms and conditions set forth in the Arizona Supreme Court’s decision. Based on these representations, the matter is closed. March 1, 2022 /s/ Caroline K. Leonard Caroline K. Leonard Vice Chair
Distribution: Mark P. Cornell, Deputy General Counsel Brooks R. Siegel, Esquire 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102 www.nhattyreg.org (603) 224-5828 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Fax (603) 228-9511