This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
John Dunlop et al. v. Daniel Daigle
John Dunlop et al. v. Daniel Daigle, 122 N.H. 295 (1982).
DecisionAffirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- John Dunlop Appellant
- Daniel Daigle Appellee
Attorneys
- Roger G. Burlingame from Wescott, Millham & Dyer, representing Plaintiffs (appellant)
- Robert A. Dietz from Normandin, Cheney & O'Neill, PLLC, representing Defendant (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Normandin, Cheney & O'Neill, PLLC Counsel firm
- Wescott, Millham & Dyer Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- William F. Batchelder Did not sit
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2, 1982 | John Dunlop et al. v. Daniel Daigle | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |