This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Hugh M. Dalzell et al. v. Robert F. Harlow et al.
Hugh M. Dalzell et al. v. Robert F. Harlow et al., 129 N.H. 43 (1986).
DecisionReversed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Robert F. Harlow Defendant
- Hugh M. Dalzell, Howard G. Dalzell, Kathleen F. Dalzell, Edward Funkhouser, and Nancy F. Funkhouser Plaintiff
- Arnold Robbins, Howard A. Layer Plaintiff
- Jane M. Layer Plaintiff
- the' defendants Defendant
Attorneys
- Paul T. Fitzgerald from Decker, Fitzgerald & Sessler, P.A.
- Peter J. Minkow from Nighswander, Martin & Mitchell, P.A., representing plaintiffs Hugh M. Dalzell, Howard G. Dalzell, Kathleen F. Dalzell, Edward Funkhouser, and Nancy F. Funkhouser
Firms and Offices
- Decker, Fitzgerald & Sessler, P.A. Counsel firm
- Nighswander, Martin & Mitchell, P.A. Counsel firm
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 30, 1986 | Hugh M. Dalzell et al. v. Robert F. Harlow et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |