This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.

The State of New Hampshire v. Matthew Schachter, Sugar River Savings Bank, Intervenor

The State of New Hampshire v. Matthew Schachter, Sugar River Savings Bank, Intervenor, 133 N.H. 439 (1990).

DecisionAffirmed.

People and Organizations

Parties

  • The State of New Hampshire Party
  • Matthew Schachter, Sugar River Savings Bank, Intervenor Appellant, Party

Attorneys

  • Thomas F. Hersey from Clark, Cook & Molan, P.A., representing Sugar River Savings Bank (appellant)
  • David S. Peck from Attorney General, representing State (appellee)

Firms and Offices

Supreme Court Justices

Case Records (1)

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
July 23, 1990 The State of New Hampshire v. Matthew Schachter, Sugar River Savings Bank, Intervenor Opinion Supreme Court Reporter