This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.

Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. City of Manchester et al.; Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. Planning Board of The City of Manchester

Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. City of Manchester et al.; Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. Planning Board of The City of Manchester, 141 N.H. 329 (1996).

DecisionAffirmed.

People and Organizations

Parties

  • Deanna and William Bradley Appellant
  • Planning Board of the City of Manchester Appellee
  • the Roman Catholic Bishops of Manchester d/b/a St Intervenor

Attorneys

  • Charles H. Morang representing Plaintiffs (appellant)
  • Sienna Church representing defendant City of Manchester (appellee)
  • Thomas R. Clark representing defendant City of Manchester (appellee)
  • William J. Donovan from Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, P.A., representing intervenor, the Roman Catholic Bishops of Manchester d/b/a St (appellee)

Firms and Offices

Supreme Court Justices

Case Records (1)

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
September 25, 1996 Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. City of Manchester et al.; Deanna and William Bradley et al. v. Planning Board of The City of Manchester Opinion Supreme Court Reporter