This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Strafford Technology, Inc. v. Camcar Division of Textron, Inc.
Strafford Technology, Inc. v. Camcar Division of Textron, Inc., 147 N.H. 174 (2001).
DecisionReversed and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Strafford Technology, Inc. Party
- Camcar Division of Textron, Inc. Party
Attorneys
- John T. Alexander from Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C., representing Defendant (appellant)
- R. Matthew Cairns from Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C., representing Defendant (appellant)
- W. Wright Danenbarger from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellee)
- Mary Ann Dempsey from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C. Counsel firm
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- John T. Broderick Jr. Authoring justice
- David A. Brock Concurring justice
- C.j Concurring justice
- And Nadeau Concurring justice
- Dalianis And Duggan Concurring justice
Superior and Lower-Court Judges
- Kenneth R. McHugh Judge
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 13, 2001 | Strafford Technology, Inc. v. Camcar Division of Textron, Inc. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |