This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Natalie Cady v. N.H. Board of Psychologists
N.C. v. New Hampshire Board of Psychologists; New Hampshire Board of Psychologists v. Alethea E. Young, Ph.D., 169 N.H. 361 (2016).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Natalie Cady Party
- N.H. Board of Psychologists Party
Attorneys
- Jason R. Crance from Law Office of Jason Crance, representing Appellants (appellant)
- Jennifer B. Hartman from Vitt & Associates, PLC, representing Appellants (appellant)
- Elizabeth A. Lahey from Attorney General, representing New Hampshire Board of Psychologists (appellant), N.H. Board of Psychologists
- Sarah J. Merlo from Vitt & Associates, PLC, representing Appellants (appellant)
- Geoffrey J. Vitt from Vitt & Associates, PLC, representing Natalie Cady (appellant)
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- Law Office of Jason Crance Counsel firm
- Vitt & Associates, PLC Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- Robert J. Lynn Authoring justice
Superior and Lower-Court Judges
- Larry M. Smukler Judge
Case Records (2)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 20, 2016 | N.C. v. New Hampshire Board of Psychologists; New Hampshire Board of Psychologists v. Alethea E. Young, Ph.D. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter, Reporter |
| April 6, 2016 | Natalie Cady v. N.H. Board of Psychologists | Oral argument text | Natalie Cady; N.H. Board of Psychologists |