This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana
State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana, 2022 N.H. 16 (2022).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Roger Dana Party
- State of New Hampshire Party
Attorneys
- Stephanie C. Hausman from New Hampshire Public Defender, representing Appellate Defender | (Stephanie Hausman) (appellant), Roger Dana (appellant)
- Weston R. Sager from Attorney General, representing State of New Hampshire (appellee)
- John M. Formella
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- New Hampshire Public Defender Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- James P. Bassett Authoring justice
Case Records (5)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 10, 2022 | State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter |
| November 16, 2021 | State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana | Oral argument text | State of New Hampshire; Roger Dana | |
| November 16, 2021 | Nov 16 2021 | Supreme Court oral argument calendar | - | |
| August 12, 2021 | State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana | Brief | State of New Hampshire | |
| March 1, 2021 | State of New Hampshire v. Roger Dana | Brief | Roger Dana |