This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 168-A:1 · Obligations of the Father
168-A:1 Obligations of the Father. – The father of a child which is or may be born of unwed parents is liable to the same extent as the father of a child born in wedlock, whether or not the child is born alive, for the reasonable expense of the mother's pregnancy and confinement and for the education and necessary support of the child. A child born of unwed parents includes a child born to a married woman by a man other than her husband. Source. 1971, 530:1. 1973, 145:4, eff. July 21, 1973.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 1971, 530:1. 1973, 145:4, eff. July 21, 1973.
Source history
- 1971, 530:1
- 1973, 145:4, eff. July 21, 1973
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB486
reference
nor child is unwed, then any grandparent filing a petition under this section shall attach with the petition proof of legitimation by the parent pursuant to RSA 460:29 or establishment of paternity pursuant to RSA 168-A. V. Upon the motion of any original party, the court may modify or terminate any order made pursuant to this section to reflect changed circumstances of the parties involved. Changed circumstances shall not in
-
2026 HB486-FN
reference
randparent filing a petition under this section shall attach with the petition proof of legitimation by the parent pursuant to RSA 460:29 or establishment of paternity pursuant to RSA 168-A. V. Upon the motion of any original party, the court may modify or terminate any order made pursuant to this section to reflect changed circumstances of the parties involved. Changed circumstances shall not include ch
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2018-0013, In the Matter of Haley St. Pierre and Adam Thatcher Supreme Court opinion · May 31, 2019
- 2003-106, IN THE MATTER OF GARY F. HALLER AND DAWN MILLS Supreme Court opinion · December 30, 2003
- 2001-409, IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE EX. REL. VICKIE REITENOUR AND WENDELL MONTGOMERY Supreme Court opinion · September 18, 2002