This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 173-B:4 · Temporary Relief
173-B:4 Temporary Relief. –
Copy linkUpon a showing of an immediate and present danger of abuse, the court may enter temporary orders to protect the plaintiff with or without actual notice to defendant. The court may issue such temporary orders by telephone or facsimile. Such telephonically issued orders shall be made by a circuit court judge to a law enforcement officer, shall be valid in any jurisdiction in the state, and shall be effective until the close of the next regular court business day. Such orders shall be returnable to the circuit court where the plaintiff resides or to which the plaintiff has fled, unless otherwise ordered by the issuing judge. If non-telephonic temporary orders are made ex parte, the party against whom such relief is issued may file a written request with the clerk of the court and request a hearing on such orders. Such hearing shall be held no less than 3 business days and no more than 5 business days after the request is received by the clerk. Such hearings may constitute the final hearing described in RSA 173-B:3, VII. Such temporary relief may direct the defendant to relinquish to a peace officer any and all firearms and ammunition in the control, ownership, or possession of the defendant, or any other person on behalf of the defendant for the duration of the protective order. Other temporary relief may include:
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from entering the premises and curtilage where the plaintiff resides, except when the defendant is accompanied by a peace officer and, upon reasonable notice to the plaintiff, is allowed entry by the plaintiff for the sole purpose of retrieving toiletries, medication, clothing, business equipment, and any other items as determined by the court.
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from withholding items of the plaintiff's personal property which are specified in the order. A peace officer shall accompany the plaintiff in retrieving such property to protect the plaintiff.
Copy linkAwarding custody of minor children to either party or, upon actual notice, to the department when it is in the best interest of a child.
Copy linkDenying the defendant visitation, ordering that visitation shall take place only at a supervised visitation center that uses a metal detection device and has trained security personnel on-site, ordering that visitation shall be supervised, or ordering a specific visitation schedule. Visitation shall only be ordered on an ex parte basis where such order can be entered consistent with the following requirements. In determining whether visitation can be safely ordered, the court shall consider the following factors:
Copy linkThe degree to which visitation exposes the plaintiff or the children to physical or psychological harm.
Copy linkWhether the risk of physical or psychological harm can be removed by ordering supervised visitation or by ordering supervised visitation at a center that uses a metal detection device and has trained security personnel on-site.
Copy linkWhether visitation can be ordered without requiring the plaintiff and defendant to have contact regarding the exchange of children.
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from contacting the plaintiff or entering the plaintiff's place of employment, school, or any specified place frequented regularly by the plaintiff or by any family or household member.
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from abusing the plaintiff, plaintiff's relatives, regardless of their place of residence, or plaintiff's household members in any way.
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from taking, converting, or damaging property in which the plaintiff may have a legal or equitable interest.
Copy linkDirecting the defendant to relinquish to the peace officer, in addition to the relief specified in RSA 173-B:4, I, any and all deadly weapons specified in the protective order that are in the control, ownership, or possession of the defendant, or any other person on behalf of the defendant, for the duration of the protective order.
Copy linkGranting the petitioner exclusive care, custody, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the petitioner, defendant, or a minor child in either household, and ordering the defendant to stay away from the animal and forbidding the defendant from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, committing an act of cruelty or neglect, or disposing of the animal.
Copy linkAwarding to the plaintiff the exclusive use and possession of an automobile, home, and household furniture, if the defendant has the legal duty to support the plaintiff or the plaintiff's minor children, or the plaintiff has contributed to the household expenses. The court shall consider the type and amount of contribution to be a factor.
Copy linkRestraining the defendant from taking any action which would lead to the disconnection of any and all utilities and services to the parties' household, or the discontinuance of existing business or service contracts, including, but not limited to, mortgage or rental agreements.
Copy linkThe defendant may be prohibited from purchasing, receiving, or possessing any deadly weapons and any and all firearms and ammunition for the duration of the order. The court may subsequently issue a search warrant authorizing the peace officer to seize any deadly weapons specified in the protective order and any and all firearms and ammunition, if there is probable cause to believe such firearms and ammunition and specified deadly weapons are kept on the premises or curtilage of the defendant and if the court has reason to believe that all such firearms and ammunition and specified deadly weapons have not been relinquished by the defendant. Source. 1999, 240:3. 2013, 62:4, eff. Jan. 1, 2014. 2014, 107:1, eff. June 11, 2014; 238:3, eff. July 21, 2014.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 1999, 240:3. 2013, 62:4, eff. Jan. 1, 2014. 2014, 107:1, eff. June 11, 2014; 238:3, eff. July 21, 2014.
Source history
- 1999, 240:3
- 2013, 62:4, eff. Jan. 1, 2014
- 2014, 107:1, eff. June 11, 2014; 238:3, eff. July 21, 2014
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB1084
amend · effective 2027-01-01
s attempted to purchase or obtain a firearm in violation of the protective order. 8 New Section; Protection of Persons from Domestic Violence; Relinquishment of Firearms. Amend RSA 173-B by inserting after section 5-a the following new section: 173-B:5-b Relinquishment of Firearms. I. A person subject to a protective order pursuant to RSA 173-B:4 or RSA 173-B:5 or an order pursuant to RSA 597:2
-
2026 HB1084
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ity to preserve the public peace, enforce laws, and make arrests within their designated jurisdiction. 2 Protection of Persons from Domestic Violence; Temporary Relief. Amend RSA 173-B:4, I(a)(9) to read as follows: (9) Directing the defendant to immediately relinquish to the peace officer serving the order, in addition to the relief specified in RSA 173-B:4, I, any and all deadly weapons [specified
-
2026 HB1084-FN
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ity to preserve the public peace, enforce laws, and make arrests within their designated jurisdiction. 2 Protection of Persons from Domestic Violence; Temporary Relief. Amend RSA 173-B:4, I(a)(9) to read as follows: (9) Directing the defendant to immediately relinquish to the peace officer serving the order, in addition to the relief specified in RSA 173-B:4, I, any and all deadly weapons [specified
-
2026 HB1084-FN
amend · effective 2027-01-01
s attempted to purchase or obtain a firearm in violation of the protective order. 8 New Section; Protection of Persons from Domestic Violence; Relinquishment of Firearms. Amend RSA 173-B by inserting after section 5-a the following new section: 173-B:5-b Relinquishment of Firearms. I. A person subject to a protective order pursuant to RSA 173-B:4 or RSA 173-B:5 or an order pursuant to RSA 597:2
-
2026 HB1284
add
and address of a voter shall not appear on the checklist at the request of the voter if the voter presents to the supervisors of the checklist a valid protective order pursuant to RSA 173-B. The name, domicile address, and mailing address, if different, of such a voter shall be maintained on a separate list of voters, which shall be nonpublic and not subject to RSA 91-A. If it is necessary to establish suc
-
2026 HB1323
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ition for a restraining order filed in good faith pursuant to RSA 458:16 or RSA 461-A:10, or a petition filed in good faith for a civil protection order pursuant to RSA 633:3-a or RSA 173-B. 2 Parental Rights and Responsibilities; Judicial Enforcement of Parenting Plan; Family Access Motion. Amend RSA 461-A:4-a, I to read as follows: I. In the event of parental alienation or substantial and material
-
2026 HB1323-FN
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ition for a restraining order filed in good faith pursuant to RSA 458:16 or RSA 461-A:10, or a petition filed in good faith for a civil protection order pursuant to RSA 633:3-a or RSA 173-B. 2 Parental Rights and Responsibilities; Judicial Enforcement of Parenting Plan; Family Access Motion. Amend RSA 461-A:4-a, I to read as follows: I. In the event of parental alienation or substantial and material
-
2026 HB1378
reference
of a legal guardian; (b) When the parent or legal guardian is the subject of a protective order involving the minor child or one of the minor child’s siblings issued pursuant to RSA 173-B, RSA 461-A, or RSA 633:3-a, or when a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that the release of the records to a parent or legal guardian is not in the child’s best interest; or (c) When a health care provide
-
2026 HB1454
reference
ion of a court order under RSA 159:3-b, if: (A) The underlying court order the defendant is accused of violating was a domestic violence order of protection issued pursuant to RSA 173-B or other order issued in connection with a domestic violence case; or (B) The defendant is also charged with domestic violence under RSA 631:2-b. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passa
-
2026 HB1454-FN
reference
ion of a court order under RSA 159:3-b, if: (A) The underlying court order the defendant is accused of violating was a domestic violence order of protection issued pursuant to RSA 173-B or other order issued in connection with a domestic violence case; or (B) The defendant is also charged with domestic violence under RSA 631:2-b. 3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passa
-
2026 HB1552
related · effective 2027-01-01
to be applied in such proceedings, the methods of notice, service, and enforcement of such orders, and the penalties for violation thereof shall be the same as those set forth in RSA 173-B. 6 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027. LBA 26-2807 12/3/25 HB 1552-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS INTRODUCED AN ACT relative to orders of protection. FISCAL IMPACT: Est
-
2026 HB1552-FN
related · effective 2027-01-01
to be applied in such proceedings, the methods of notice, service, and enforcement of such orders, and the penalties for violation thereof shall be the same as those set forth in RSA 173-B. 6 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027. LBA 26-2807 12/3/25 HB 1552-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS INTRODUCED AN ACT relative to orders of protection. FISCAL IMPACT: Est
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2022-0114, S.D. v. N.B. Supreme Court opinion · June 29, 2023
- LD-2011-010, Clauson's Case Supreme Court opinion · September 18, 2012
- 2009-798, Jeffrey M. Gray v. Teri E. Kelly & a. Supreme Court opinion · November 24, 2010
- 2009-681, In the Matter of Robin Sawyer and Patrick Sawyer Supreme Court opinion · October 19, 2010
- 2008-829, Michelle Hemenway v. Edmund J. Hemenway, Jr. Supreme Court opinion · January 29, 2010
- 2008-526, LYNETTE WALKER v. CLIFFORD WALKER Supreme Court opinion · April 17, 2009
- 2008-616, STATE OF NH v. RAYMOND K. FOURNIER Supreme Court opinion · March 19, 2009
- 2005-326, RIC PAUL v. FRANKLIN C. SHERBURNE Supreme Court opinion · July 21, 2006
- 2003-362, THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. STEVEN KIDDER Supreme Court opinion · February 27, 2004
- 2000-834, PRUDENCE G. MAGOON v. RICHARD J. THOROUGHGOOD Supreme Court opinion · July 26, 2002