This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 265-A:11 · Evidence
265-A:11 Evidence. –
Copy linkUpon complaint, information, indictment, or trial of any person charged with the violation of RSA 265-A:2, the court may admit evidence of physical testing of the defendant for being under the influence of intoxicating liquor or controlled drugs, prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, or any other chemical substances, natural or synthetic, which impair a person's ability to drive as provided in RSA 265-A:4, and of the controlled drug, prescription drug, over-the-counter drug, or any other chemical substance, natural or synthetic, which impairs a person's ability to drive content of the defendant's blood and the defendant's alcohol concentration, as shown by a test of his or her breath, blood, or urine as provided in RSA 265-A:4. Evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.03 or less is prima facie evidence that the defendant was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of more than 0.03 and less than 0.08 is relevant evidence but is not to be given prima facie effect in indicating whether or not the defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor, but such fact may be considered with other competent evidence in determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more is prima facie evidence that the defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. In addition, evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more shall, in conjunction with the evidence otherwise required by RSA 265-A:2, I(b) of driving or attempting to drive a vehicle upon a way, constitute a separate offense under RSA 265-A:2, I(b); and evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more shall, in conjunction with the evidence otherwise required by RSA 265-A:3, II of driving or attempting to drive a vehicle upon a way and of one or more of the circumstances specified in RSA 265-A:3, II(a), (b), (c), and (d) constitute a separate offense under RSA 265-A:3, II; and evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.16 or more shall, in conjunction with the evidence otherwise required by RSA 265-A:3, III of driving or attempting to drive a vehicle upon a way, constitute a separate offense under RSA 265-A:3, III.
Copy linkUpon complaint, information, indictment, or trial of any person charged with a violation of the provisions of RSA 265-A:2, II relative to the operation of boats by a person under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a controlled drug, prescription drug, over-the-counter drug, or any other chemical substance, natural or synthetic, which impairs a person's ability to drive the court may admit evidence of the defendant's alcohol concentration at the time alleged, as shown by a chemical, infrared molecular absorption, or liquid or gas chromatograph test or tests of his or her breath, urine, or blood. Evidence that there was, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, is prima facie evidence that the defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Evidence that the defendant had, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of more than 0.03 and less than 0.08 is relevant evidence and may be considered with other competent evidence in determining whether or not the defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Evidence that the defendant had, at the time alleged, an alcohol concentration of 0.03 or less is prima facie evidence that the defendant was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Source. 2006, 260:1. 2012, 267:9, eff. Jan. 1, 2013. 2017, 78:3, eff. July 1, 2017.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 2006, 260:1. 2012, 267:9, eff. Jan. 1, 2013. 2017, 78:3, eff. July 1, 2017.
Source history
- 2006, 260:1
- 2012, 267:9, eff. Jan. 1, 2013
- 2017, 78:3, eff. July 1, 2017
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB1235
reference
or arrest for a different offense. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit a law enforcement agency from investigating or charging a person for a violation of RSA 265-A. (c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as forbidding any police officer from taking into custody any minor who is found violating paragraph III or IV. (d) Any person under 21 years of age in possession of a
-
2026 HB1235-FN
reference
or arrest for a different offense. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit a law enforcement agency from investigating or charging a person for a violation of RSA 265-A. (c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as forbidding any police officer from taking into custody any minor who is found violating paragraph III or IV. (d) Any person under 21 years of age in possession of a
-
2026 HB1486
reference · effective 2027-01-01
any insured solely because a spouse, household member, or relative by marriage has had their license suspended or revoked, or has been convicted of driving while intoxicated under RSA 265-A. II. No insurer shall require an insured to obtain a higher level of coverage, file proof of financial responsibility, or purchase any rider, endorsement, or policy solely because of the license status or driving rec
-
2026 HB186
reference
r does not have lawful grounds for arrest for a different offense. (b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit a law enforcement agency from investigating or charging a person for a violation of RSA 265-A. (c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as forbidding any police officer from taking into custody any minor who is found violating paragraph II[,] or III[, or IV]. (d) Any person under 21 years of age
-
2026 HB186-FN-A
reference
8-F:21 Driving; Minors; and Control of Property. I. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit driving or operating under the influence of drugs or liquor pursuant to RSA 265-A, nor shall this section prevent the state from enacting and imposing penalties for driving under the influence of or while impaired by cannabis. II. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit the transfer of
-
2026 SB651
reference
8-F:17 Driving; Minors; and Control of Property. I. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit driving or operating under the influence of drugs or liquor pursuant to RSA 265-A, nor shall this section prevent the state from enacting and imposing penalties for driving under the influence of or while impaired by cannabis. II. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit the transfer of
-
2026 SB651-FN-A
reference
8-F:17 Driving; Minors; and Control of Property. I. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit driving or operating under the influence of drugs or liquor pursuant to RSA 265-A, nor shall this section prevent the state from enacting and imposing penalties for driving under the influence of or while impaired by cannabis. II. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit the transfer of
-
2025 HB198
reference
workplace or to affect the ability of employers to have policies restricting the use of cannabis by employees. (b) Be construed to permit driving or operating under the influence of drugs or liquor pursuant to RSA 265-A, nor prevent the state from enacting and imposing penalties for driving under the influence of or while impaired by cannabis. (c) Be construed to permit the transfer of cannabis, with or without remuneration,
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2008-287, State of New Hampshire v. Anthony Dilboy Supreme Court opinion · April 20, 2010
- 2008-826, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JESSICA KELLEY Supreme Court opinion · December 4, 2009