This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 358-A:6 · Penalties
358-A:6 Penalties. – I. Any person convicted of violating RSA 358-A:2 hereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor if a natural person, or guilty of a felony if any other person. II. Any person who violates the terms of an injunction issued under RSA 358-A:4, III, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor if a natural person, or guilty of a felony if any other person. For the purposes of this section, the court issuing said injunction shall retain jurisdiction. III. Any person who subverts the intent and purposes of this chapter by filing false, misleading, or substantially inaccurate statements with the attorney general for the purposes of effecting prosecution under this chapter shall be guilty of a violation. IV. If any person is found to have engaged in any act or practice declared unlawful by this chapter, the court may award to the state in any action brought under this chapter all legal costs and expenses. RSA 525:12 shall apply to civil actions commenced under this chapter. Source. 1970, 19:1. 1973, 529:85. 1975, 417:5, eff. Aug. 15, 1975.
Source note
Source. 1970, 19:1. 1973, 529:85. 1975, 417:5, eff. Aug. 15, 1975.
Source history
- 1970, 19:1
- 1973, 529:85
- 1975, 417:5, eff. Aug. 15, 1975
Related materials
Bills affecting or mentioning this RSA
- 2026 HB1215 reference
- 2026 HB1262-FN reference
- 2026 HB1517-FN related
- 2026 HB1589-FN amend
- 2026 HB1612-FN amend · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1653 reference
- 2026 HB1694-FN reference · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1755-FN reference · 2027-01-01
- 2026 HB1784-FN reference
- 2026 HB359 amend
- 2026 HB649-FN amend
- 2026 SB477-FN reference · 2027-01-01
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2011-154, The State of New Hampshire v. Empire Automotive Group, Inc Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 28, 2011
- 2008-026, STATE OF NH v. JAMES MORAN Supreme Court opinion · Jan. 29, 2009
- 2001-189, IN RE ESTATE OF GERALDINE A. RADUAZO Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 18, 2002