RSA 359-M:2 · Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement

359-M:2 Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement. –

Copy link

I.

A person shall not make a bad faith assertion of patent infringement.

Copy link

II.

A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:

Copy link

(a)

The demand letter does not contain the following information:

Copy link

(1)

The patent number.

Copy link

(2)

The name and address of the patent owner or owners and assignee or assignees, if any.

Copy link

(3)

Factual allegations concerning the specific areas in which the target's products, services, and technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claims in the patent.

Copy link

(b)

Prior to sending the demand letter, the person fails to conduct an analysis comparing the claims in the patent to the target's products, services, and technology, or such an analysis was done but does not identify specific areas in which the products, services, and technology are covered by the claims in the patent.

Copy link

(c)

The demand letter lacks the information described in subparagraph II(a), the target requests the information, and the person fails to provide the information within a reasonable period of time.

Copy link

(d)

The demand letter demands payment of a license fee or response within an unreasonably short period of time.

Copy link

(e)

The person offers to license the patent for an amount that is not based on a reasonable estimate of the value of the license.

Copy link

(f)

The claim or assertion of patent infringement is meritless, and the person knew or should have known that the claim or assertion is meritless.

Copy link

(g)

The claim or assertion of patent infringement is deceptive.

Copy link

(h)

The person or its subsidiaries or affiliates have previously filed or threatened to file one or more lawsuits based on the same or a similar claim of patent infringement; and

Copy link

(1)

Those threats or lawsuits lacked the information described in subparagraph II(a); or

Copy link

(2)

The person attempted to enforce the claim of patent infringement in litigation and a court found the claim to be meritless.

Copy link

(i)

Any other factor the court finds relevant.

Copy link

III.

A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:

Copy link

(a)

The demand letter contains the information described in subparagraph II(a).

Copy link

(b)

Where the demand letter lacks the information described in subparagraph II(a) and the target requests the information, the person provides the information within a reasonable period of time.

Copy link

(c)

The person engages in a good faith effort to establish that the target has infringed the patent and to negotiate an appropriate remedy.

Copy link

(d)

The person makes a substantial investment in the use of the patent or in the production or sale of a product or item covered by the patent.

Copy link

(e)

The person is:

Copy link

(1)

The inventor or joint inventor of the patent or, in the case of a patent filed by and awarded to an assignee of the original inventor or joint inventor, is the original assignee; or

Copy link

(2)

An institution of higher education or a technology transfer organization owned or affiliated with an institution of higher education.

Copy link

(f)

The person has:

Copy link

(1)

Demonstrated good faith business practices in previous efforts to enforce the patent, or a substantially similar patent; or

Copy link

(2)

Successfully enforced the patent, or a substantially similar patent through litigation.

Copy link

(g)

Any other factor the court finds relevant. Source. 2014, 197:2, eff. July 11, 2014.

Copy link