This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 420-J:6 · Utilization Review
420-J:6 Utilization Review. –
Copy linkEach health carrier conducting utilization review directly or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity shall have written procedures for carrying out its utilization review processes and shall file such procedures with the commissioner on or before April 1 of each year. Health carriers shall conform to the standards of either the Utilization Review Accreditation Commission or the National Committee for Quality Assurances and are subject to all applicable rules issued pursuant to RSA 420-E:7.
Copy linkThe written procedures shall describe the categories of health care personnel that perform utilization review activities and whether or not such individuals are licensed in this state, and shall address at a minimum: prior authorization requirements; second opinion programs; pre-hospital admission certification; pre-inpatient service eligibility certification; and concurrent hospital review to determine appropriate length of stay; as well as the process used by the health carrier to preserve confidentiality of medical information.
Copy linkThe clinical review criteria used by a health carrier or its contracted utilization review entity shall be in writing and:
Copy linkDeveloped with input from appropriate actively practicing practitioners in the health carrier's service area;
Copy linkUpdated at least biennially and as new treatments, applications, and technologies emerge;
Copy linkAll contracts that health carriers make with a utilization review entity shall be available to the commissioner upon request.
Copy linkDisclosure of prior authorization requirements and publication of prior authorization performance indicators.
Copy linkA health carrier conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall make any current prior authorization requirements and restrictions readily accessible on its website to enrollees, health care professionals, and the general public. This includes the written clinical criteria. Requirements shall be described in detail, but also in easily understandable language.
Copy linkIf a health carrier or its contracted utilization review entity intends either to implement a new prior authorization requirement or restriction, or amend an existing requirement or restriction, the health carrier shall:
Copy linkEnsure that the new or amended requirement is not implemented unless the health carrier's website has been updated to reflect the new or amended requirement or restriction.
Copy linkProvide contracted health care providers of enrollees written notice of the new or amended requirement or amendment no less than 60 days before the requirement or restriction is implemented.
Copy linkEffective March 31, 2026, health carriers conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall make prior authorization metrics as specified in 45 C.F.R section 156.223 available to the commissioner, and the commissioner shall display relevant corresponding data, in a carrier specific format, on a website maintained by the insurance department in a readily accessible format.
Copy linkQualifications of reviewers making medical necessity determinations. A health carrier conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall ensure that all medical necessity determinations are made by a qualified health care provider. A reviewing provider shall:
Copy linkHave appropriate medical and professional expertise and credentials to competently apply the health carrier's clinical review criteria.
Copy linkMake the medical necessity determination under the clinical direction of one of the health carrier's own medical directors or one of the contracted utilization review entity's medical directors who is responsible for the review of health care services provided to covered persons who are residents of New Hampshire.
Copy linkMedical directors. Each health carrier that conducts utilization review shall employ one or more medical directors who shall have responsibility for all utilization review techniques and methods and their administration and implementation and who shall be licensed in New Hampshire under RSA 329. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude a medical director from consulting with or relying on the advice of a physician licensed in this state or any other state. Nothing in this section shall be construed as creating any civil liability to the medical director for the medical director's alleged negligent performance of the aforementioned responsibilities for utilization review.
Copy linkTimeliness standards for processing prior authorization requests submitted electronically. Health carriers conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall meet the following time frames for prior authorization determinations requested by participating providers or facilities that submit the prior authorization request through an electronic prior authorization process as designated by the health carrier:
Copy linkIn non-urgent circumstances, health carriers requiring prior authorization of a health care service shall approve or deny authorization and notify the covered person and the covered person's health care provider of the determination within 7 calendar days of obtaining all information necessary to make the determination. Any request that the health carrier makes for additional information necessary to make the determination shall be made within 7 calendar days of the prior authorization request date.
Copy linkIn urgent circumstances, health carriers requiring prior authorization of a health care service shall approve or deny authorization and notify the covered person and the covered person's health care provider of the determination as expeditiously as the covered person's medical condition requires, and not later than 72 hours after obtaining all information necessary to make the determination. Any request that the health carrier makes for additional information necessary to make the determination shall be made as expeditiously as required to meet the 72-hour timeline, assuming a timely response from the treating provider.
Copy linkTimeliness standards for processing prior authorization requests submitted non-electronically. Health carriers conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall meet the following time frames for prior authorization determinations requested by participating providers or facilities that submit the prior authorization request through a non-electronic prior authorization process:
Copy linkIn non-urgent circumstances, health carriers requiring prior authorization of a health care service shall approve or deny authorization and notify the covered person and the covered person's health care provider of the determination within 14 calendar days of obtaining all information necessary to make the determination. Any request that the health carrier makes for additional information necessary to make the determination shall be made within 7 calendar days of the prior authorization request date.
Copy linkIn urgent circumstances, health carriers requiring prior authorization of a health care service shall approve or deny authorization and notify the covered person and the covered person's health care provider of the determination as expeditiously as the covered person's medical condition requires, and not later than 72 hours after obtaining all information necessary to make the determination. Any request that the health carrier makes for additional information necessary to make the determination shall be made as expeditiously as required to meet the 72-hour timeline, assuming a timely response from the treating provider.
Copy linkIn paragraphs V and VI, "all information necessary to make the determination" shall include any information that may have been provided through a peer-to-peer review.
Copy linkA prior authorization request shall be considered approved if the health carrier fails to notify the covered person and the covered person's health care provider of the prior authorization determination within the timeliness standards for making a determination after obtaining all necessary information.
Copy linkHealth carriers conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall not revoke, limit, condition, or restrict a prior authorization if care is provided within 60 business days from the date the health care provider received approval of the prior authorization request.
Copy linkA health carrier conducting utilization review directly, or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity, shall pay a participating health care provider at the contracted payment rate for a health care service provided by the health care provider pursuant to a prior authorization determination that coverage is available unless:
Copy linkThe health care provider materially misrepresented the health care service in the prior authorization request;
Copy linkThe health care provider was no longer contracted with the covered person's health carrier on the date the care was provided;
Copy linkThe health care provider failed to meet the health carrier's timely filing requirements;
Copy linkThe patient was no longer eligible for health care coverage on the day the care was provided; or
Copy linkThe health carrier does not have liability for the claim or for a part of the claim for any reason under the covered person's coverage policy, the provider contract between the health carrier and the participating provider, or any other reason applicable at law or in equity.
Copy linkOption to request a peer-to-peer review. When a health carrier requires prior authorization for an item or service, the carrier shall offer the provider the opportunity to request a peer-to-peer review of a prior authorization request in which the provider is able to have a direct conversational exchange with a medical director or a designated provider who is a clinical peer about the basis for the prior authorization request. A "clinical peer" in this context shall be a health care professional who has demonstrable expertise to review a case, whether or not the reviewing professional is in the same or a similar specialty as the provider. The peer-to-peer review may be requested before the carrier's prior authorization determination or after a prior authorization denial and before a formal grievance request has been made. The peer-to-peer review shall be made available by the health carrier within 2 business days of the request. If the peer-to-peer review is requested after a prior authorization denial, the heath carrier shall treat the review request as a request for reconsideration that is external to the grievance process and shall provide the provider and the covered person a written determination containing a statement of the specific reasons for the reconsideration determination with reference to the information provided in the peer-to-peer review. The written reconsideration determination shall be provided within 7 business days of the peer-to-peer review.
Copy linkNothing in this section shall be construed to contravene a covered person's right to external review under RSA 420-J:5-a. Unless otherwise required by law, the prior authorization requirements set out in this chapter shall apply to all medical services and items. Source. 1997, 345:1. 2000, 18:5, 15. 2001, 207:13. 2003, 276:11, eff. July 1, 2003. 2024, 172:5, eff. Jan. 1, 2025.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 1997, 345:1. 2000, 18:5, 15. 2001, 207:13. 2003, 276:11, eff. July 1, 2003. 2024, 172:5, eff. Jan. 1, 2025.
Source history
- 1997, 345:1
- 2000, 18:5, 15
- 2001, 207:13
- 2003, 276:11, eff. July 1, 2003
- 2024, 172:5, eff. Jan. 1, 2025
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB1197
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ired time frames for requesting external review, and notice of the conditions under which expedited external review is available. 20 Managed Care Law; Utilization Review. Amend RSA 420-J:6, I(a) to read as follows: (a) Each health carrier conducting utilization review directly or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity shall have written procedures for carrying out its utilization revi
-
2026 HB1197-FN
amend · effective 2027-01-01
ired time frames for requesting external review, and notice of the conditions under which expedited external review is available. 20 Managed Care Law; Utilization Review. Amend RSA 420-J:6, I(a) to read as follows: (a) Each health carrier conducting utilization review directly or indirectly through a contracted utilization review entity shall have written procedures for carrying out its utilization revi
-
2026 HB1268
reference · effective 2027-01-01
pharmacy or pharmacist to reverse and rebill the claim in question. (3) All claims adjudications, appeals, and utilization review processes shall comply with the requirements of RSA 420-J and rules promulgated thereunder. (b) For every drug for which the health carrier or pharmacy benefit manager establishes a maximum allowable cost to determine the drug product reimbursement, the health carrier or p
-
2026 HB1323
amend · effective 2027-01-01
shall consider the factors set forth in RSA 461-A:6. 10 New Section; Managed Care Law; Prior Authorization for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy; When Required. Amend RSA 420-J by inserting after section 6-e the following new section: 420-J:6-f Prior Authorization for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy; When Required. I. A health carrier shall not require prior authorization for
-
2026 HB1323-FN
amend · effective 2027-01-01
shall consider the factors set forth in RSA 461-A:6. 10 New Section; Managed Care Law; Prior Authorization for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy; When Required. Amend RSA 420-J by inserting after section 6-e the following new section: 420-J:6-f Prior Authorization for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy; When Required. I. A health carrier shall not require prior authorization for
-
2026 HB1406
amend · effective 2027-01-01
se of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 New Subparagraph; Managed Care Law; Utilization Review; Standards and Procedures for Use of Artificial Intelligence. Amend RSA 420-J:6, I by inserting after subparagraph (d) the following new subparagraph: (e) Each health carrier shall maintain written records related to the health carrier’s use of algorithms, artificial intelligence, or other mach
-
2026 HB1463
reference
nduct a detailed analysis and report, in consultation with practicing community physicians in every New Hampshire county and health system, to assess compliance with RSA 420-E and RSA 420-J and make recommendations for appropriate penalties for insurers and insurance carriers not in compliance with such chapters of law. The department shall report its findings to the speaker of the house of representative
-
2026 HB1463-FN
reference
nduct a detailed analysis and report, in consultation with practicing community physicians in every New Hampshire county and health system, to assess compliance with RSA 420-E and RSA 420-J and make recommendations for appropriate penalties for insurers and insurance carriers not in compliance with such chapters of law. The department shall report its findings to the speaker of the house of representative
-
2026 HB1554
amend · effective 2027-07-01
section shall constitute an unfair insurance practice under RSA 417 and may be subject to administrative penalties by the insurance commissioner. 3 Utilization Review. Amend RSA 420-J:6, X to read as follows: X. Option to request a peer-to-peer review. When a health carrier requires prior authorization for an item or service, the carrier shall offer the provider the opportunity to request a peer-t
-
2026 HB1554-FN
amend · effective 2027-07-01
section shall constitute an unfair insurance practice under RSA 417 and may be subject to administrative penalties by the insurance commissioner. 3 Utilization Review. Amend RSA 420-J:6, X to read as follows: X. Option to request a peer-to-peer review. When a health carrier requires prior authorization for an item or service, the carrier shall offer the provider the opportunity to request a peer-t
-
2026 HB1638
amend
ep therapy protocols when medically necessary. Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 New Subdivision; Step Therapy. Amend RSA 420-J by inserting after section 26 the following new subdivision: Step Therapy 420-J:27 Definitions. As used in this subdivision: I. "Advanced, metastatic cancer" means a cancer that has spread from the primary or orig
-
2026 HB1638-FN
amend
ep therapy protocols when medically necessary. Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened: 1 New Subdivision; Step Therapy. Amend RSA 420-J by inserting after section 26 the following new subdivision: Step Therapy 420-J:27 Definitions. As used in this subdivision: I. "Advanced, metastatic cancer" means a cancer that has spread from the primary or orig