This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 516:29-a · Testimony of Expert Witnesses
516:29-a Testimony of Expert Witnesses. – I. A witness shall not be allowed to offer expert testimony unless the court finds: (a) Such testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data; (b) Such testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (c) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. II. (a) In evaluating the basis for proffered expert testimony, the court shall consider, if appropriate to the circumstances, whether the expert's opinions were supported by theories or techniques that: (1) Have been or can be tested; (2) Have been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) Have a known or potential rate of error; and (4) Are generally accepted in the appropriate scientific literature. (b) In making its findings, the court may consider other factors specific to the proffered testimony. Source. 2004, 118:1, eff. July 16, 2004.
Source note
Source. 2004, 118:1, eff. July 16, 2004.
Source history
- 2004, 118:1, eff. July 16, 2004
Related materials
Bills affecting or mentioning this RSA
- 2026 HB1116 amend
- 2026 HB1424 amend · 2027-01-01
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2009-232, Wesley Beckles & a. v. Jennifer E. Madden, M.D. & a. Supreme Court opinion · April 9, 2010
- 2009-274, Appeal of Pennichuck Water Works, Inc. & a. Supreme Court opinion · March 25, 2010
- 2006-305 & 2008-312, STATE OF NH v. KEVIN C. WHITTAKER Supreme Court opinion · June 3, 2009
- 2007-807, JOSEPH P. GOUDREAULT, JR. v. THOMAS J. KLEEMAN Supreme Court opinion · Jan. 9, 2009
- 2007-102, SHELBY BAXTER, BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, PATRICIA BAXTER v. CHARLES TEMPLE & a. Supreme Court opinion · May 20, 2008
- 2007-300, STATE OF NH v. RICHARD LANGILL Supreme Court opinion · April 4, 2008
- 2005-809, JOHN MILLIKEN & a. v. DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC Supreme Court opinion · Dec. 28, 2006