This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 542:8 · Jurisdiction of Court to Confirm, Modify, or Vacate Award
542:8 Jurisdiction of Court to Confirm, Modify, or Vacate Award. – At any time within one year after the award is made any party to the arbitration may apply to the superior court for an order confirming the award, correcting or modifying the award for plain mistake, or vacating the award for fraud, corruption, or misconduct by the parties or by the arbitrators, or on the ground that the arbitrators have exceeded their powers. Where an award is vacated and the time within which the agreement required the award to be made has not expired, the court may in its discretion, direct a rehearing by the arbitrators or by new arbitrators appointed by the court. Source. 1929, 147:1. RL 415:8.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 1929, 147:1. RL 415:8.
Source history
- 1929, 147:1. RL 415:8
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB1615
reference · effective 2027-01-01
nding arbitration clause governing breach or dissolution. II. Where such a clause is included, courts shall limit review to the grounds for vacating an arbitration award under RSA 542. III. No party may seek equitable relief outside the terms of the agreement. 457-B:7 Legal Effect. I. A contract marriage, when formed and filed in accordance with this chapter, shall be recognized by the state
-
2026 HB1615-FN
reference · effective 2027-01-01
nding arbitration clause governing breach or dissolution. II. Where such a clause is included, courts shall limit review to the grounds for vacating an arbitration award under RSA 542. III. No party may seek equitable relief outside the terms of the agreement. 457-B:7 Legal Effect. I. A contract marriage, when formed and filed in accordance with this chapter, shall be recognized by the state
-
2026 SB558
reference · effective 2026-07-01
the parties within 14 days of the conclusion of the resolution process. The administrator's decision regarding the claim shall be final and non-appealable, and the provisions of RSA 542:8, RSA 542:9, and RSA 542:10 shall not apply, provided, however, that either the claimant or the AG designee may request the administrator to reconsider a decision on grounds that it contains mathematical mistakes, miscal
-
2025 HB2
reference
all issue a written decision to the parties within 14 days of the conclusion of the resolution process. The administrator's decision regarding the claim shall be final and non-appealable, and the provisions of RSA 542:8, RSA 542:9, and RSA 542:10 shall not apply, provided, however, that either the claimant or the AG designee may request the administrator to reconsider a decision on grounds that it contains mathematical mistak
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2021-0511, City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Police Commission/Police Department v. Portsmouth Ranking Officers Association, NEPBA, Local 220 Supreme Court opinion · June 7, 2023
- 2021-0061, Keene School District v. Keene Education Association, NEA-NH Supreme Court opinion · February 8, 2022
- 2016-0592, Joseph Rizzo v. Allstate Insurance Company Supreme Court opinion · May 1, 2018
- 2014-0739, Signal Aviation Services, Inc. v. City of Lebanon Supreme Court opinion · June 28, 2016
- 2015-0332, Alice Finn v. Ballentine Partners, LLC & a. Supreme Court opinion · June 14, 2016
- 2013-0874, James Conant & a. v. Timothy O’Meara & a. Supreme Court opinion · May 15, 2015
- 2011-318, Lebanon Hangar Associates, Ltd. v. City of Lebanon Supreme Court opinion · June 12, 2012
- 2006-657, CHARLES TIBERGHEIN & a. v. B.R. JONES ROOFING CO. Supreme Court opinion · August 28, 2007
- 2005-726, MICHAEL CORCORAN & a. v. CRAIG W. HARMON Supreme Court opinion · November 28, 2006
- 2005-564, STEPHEN A. DILLMAN v. TOWN OF HOOKSETT Supreme Court opinion · April 7, 2006
- 2004-634, MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, M.D. v. JOSEPH M. GRACIANO, M.D. & a. Supreme Court opinion · April 11, 2005
- 2003-564, CHARLES TIBERGHEIN & a. v. B.R. JONES ROOFING COMPANY Supreme Court opinion · September 1, 2004