This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 554-A:7 · Disclosure of Content of Electronic Communications of Deceased User
554-A:7 Disclosure of Content of Electronic Communications of Deceased User. – If a deceased user consented or a court directs disclosure of the contents of electronic communications of the user, the custodian shall disclose to the personal representative of the estate of the user the content of an electronic communication sent or received by the user if the representative gives the custodian:
Copy linkUnless the user provided direction using an online tool, a copy of the user's will, trust, power of attorney, or other record evidencing the user's consent to disclosure of the content of electronic communications; and
Copy linkA number, username, address, or other unique subscriber or account identifier assigned by the custodian to identify the user's account;
Copy linkThe user had a specific account with the custodian, identifiable by the information specified in subparagraph (1);
Copy linkDisclosure of the content of electronic communications of the user would not violate 18 U.S.C. section 2701 et seq., as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 222, as amended, or other applicable law;
Copy linkUnless the user provided direction using an online tool, the user consented to disclosure of the content of electronic communications; or
Copy linkDisclosure of the content of electronic communications of the user is reasonably necessary for administration of the estate. Source. 2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019.
Source history
- 2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB639
reference
sts created to hold cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it does not specify if a smart contract is governed by existing contract laws. The bill does not directly reference the existing RSA 554-A (Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act). These ambiguities could lead to more litigation and, consequently, increased costs. The Branch states this bill could possibly result in an increase in civi
-
2026 HB639-FN
reference
sts created to hold cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it does not specify if a smart contract is governed by existing contract laws. The bill does not directly reference the existing RSA 554-A (Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act). These ambiguities could lead to more litigation and, consequently, increased costs. The Branch states this bill could possibly result in an increase in civi