This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.

RSA 554-A:9 · Disclosure of Content of Electronic Communications of Principal

Title: LVI: PROBATE COURTS AND DECEDENTS' ESTATES
Chapter: 554-A · REVISED UNIFORM FIDUCIARY ACCESS TO DIGITAL ASSETS ACT
Status: current
Official source linked: Yes

Official source Copy section link

554-A:9 Disclosure of Content of Electronic Communications of Principal. – To the extent a power of attorney expressly grants an agent authority over the content of electronic communications sent or received by the principal and unless directed otherwise by the principal or the court, a custodian shall disclose to the agent the content if the agent gives the custodian:

Copy link

(a)

A written request for disclosure in physical or electronic form;

Copy link

(b)

An original or copy of the power of attorney expressly granting the agent authority over the content of electronic communications of the principal;

Copy link

(c)

A certification by the agent, under penalty of perjury, that the power of attorney is in effect; and

Copy link

(d)

If requested by the custodian:

Copy link

(1)

A number, username, address, or other unique subscriber or account identifier assigned by the custodian to identify the principal's account; or

Copy link

(2)

Evidence linking the account to the principal. Source. 2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019.

Copy link

Source note

Source. 2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019.

Source history

2019, 140:1, eff. June 25, 2019

Related materials

Bill relationships

2026 HB639 reference
sts created to hold cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it does not specify if a smart contract is governed by existing contract laws. The bill does not directly reference the existing RSA 554-A (Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act). These ambiguities could lead to more litigation and, consequently, increased costs. The Branch states this bill could possibly result in an increase in civi
2026 HB639-FN reference
sts created to hold cryptocurrency. Furthermore, it does not specify if a smart contract is governed by existing contract laws. The bill does not directly reference the existing RSA 554-A (Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act). These ambiguities could lead to more litigation and, consequently, increased costs. The Branch states this bill could possibly result in an increase in civi