This RSA section is an unofficial mirror, is not legal advice, and may be incomplete, outdated, or incorrectly processed.
RSA 676:17 · Fines and Penalties; Second Offense
676:17 Fines and Penalties; Second Offense. –
Copy linkAny person who violates any of the provisions of this title, or any local ordinance, code, or regulation adopted under this title, or any provision or specification of any application, plat, or plan approved by, or any requirement or condition of a permit or decision issued by, any local administrator or land use board acting under the authority of this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor if a natural person, or guilty of a felony if any other person; and shall be subject to a civil penalty of $275 for the first offense, and $550 for subsequent offenses, for each day that such violation is found to continue after the conviction date or after the date on which the violator receives written notice from the municipality that the violator is in violation, whichever is earlier. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense.
Copy linkIn any legal action brought by a municipality to enforce, by way of injunctive relief as provided by RSA 676:15 or otherwise, any local ordinance, code or regulation adopted under this title, or to enforce any planning board, zoning board of adjustment or building code board of appeals decision made pursuant to this title, or to seek the payment of any fine levied under paragraph I, the municipality shall recover its costs and reasonable attorney's fees actually expended in pursuing the legal action if it is found to be a prevailing party in the action. For the purposes of this paragraph, recoverable costs shall include all out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred, including but not limited to, inspection fees, expert fees and investigatory expenses.
Copy linkIf any violation of a local ordinance, code or regulation, or any violation of a planning board, zoning board of adjustment or building code board of appeals decision, results in the expenditure of public funds by a municipality which are not reimbursed under paragraph II, the court in its discretion may order, as an additional civil penalty, that a violator make restitution to the municipality for such funds so expended.
Copy linkThe superior court may, upon a petition filed by a municipality and after notice and a preliminary hearing as in the case of prejudgment attachments under RSA 511-A, require an alleged violator to post a bond with the court to secure payment of any penalty or remedy or the performance of any injunctive relief which may be ordered or both. At the hearing, the burden shall be on the municipality to show that there is a strong likelihood that it will prevail on the merits, that the penalties or remedies sought are reasonably likely to be awarded by the court in an amount consistent with the bond sought, and that the bond represents the amount of the projected expense of compliance with the injunctive relief sought.
Copy linkThe building inspector or other local official with the authority to enforce the provisions of this title or any local ordinance, code, or regulation adopted under this title may commence an action under paragraph I either in the district court pursuant to RSA 502-A:11-a, or in the superior court. The prosecuting official in the official's discretion may, prior to or at the time of arraignment, charge the offense as a violation, and in such cases the penalties to be imposed by the court shall be limited to those provided for a violation under RSA 651:2 and the civil penalty provided in subparagraph I(b) of this section. The provisions of this section shall supersede any inconsistent local penalty provision. Source. 1983, 447:1. 1985, 103:25; 210:4. 1988, 19:6, 7. 1996, 226:5, 6. 1997, 92:4, 5. 2004, 242:1. 2006, 101:1. 2009, 173:1, eff. Sept. 11, 2009.
Copy linkSource note
Source. 1983, 447:1. 1985, 103:25; 210:4. 1988, 19:6, 7. 1996, 226:5, 6. 1997, 92:4, 5. 2004, 242:1. 2006, 101:1. 2009, 173:1, eff. Sept. 11, 2009.
Source history
- 1983, 447:1
- 1985, 103:25; 210:4
- 1988, 19:6, 7
- 1996, 226:5, 6
- 1997, 92:4, 5
- 2004, 242:1
- 2006, 101:1
- 2009, 173:1, eff. Sept. 11, 2009
Related materials
Bill relationships
-
2026 HB244
amend · effective 2026-07-01
inistrator or land use board acting under the authority of this title, subject to the following: 61 Local Land Use Citations; Pleas by Mail. Amend the introductory paragraph of RSA 676:17-b, and RSA 676:17-b, I to read as follows: 676:17-b Local Land Use Citations; Pleas by Mail. A [building inspector or other] local official with authority to prosecute an offense within the scope of RSA 676:17, and who
-
2026 HB244
amend · effective 2026-07-01
nalty provided in subparagraph I(b) of this section. The provisions of this section shall supersede any inconsistent local penalty provision. 60 Cease and Desist Orders. Amend RSA 676:17-a introductory paragraph to read as follows: 676:17-a Cease and Desist Orders. The [building inspector,] code enforcement officer, zoning administrator or other official designated as an enforcement authority by ordina
-
2026 HB244
amend · effective 2026-07-01
ate action or proceeding to prevent, enjoin, abate, or remove such unlawful erection, construction, alteration, or reconstruction. 58 Fines and Penalties; Second Offense. Amend RSA 676:17, I through III to read as follows: I. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this title, or any local ordinance[, code,] or regulation adopted under this title, or any provision or specification of any appli
-
2026 SB508
amend
hwith transmit to the board all the papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. 2 New Section; Stamping and Acceptance of Revised Plans. Amend RSA 676 by inserting after section 5 the following new section: 676:5-a Stamping and Acceptance of Revised Plans. I. Each city, town, or municipality shall stamp and accept revised plans submitted by an applicant within 10 b
Opinions and discipline decisions mentioning this RSA
- 2022-0098, Town of Conway v. Scott Kudrick Supreme Court opinion · May 2, 2023
- 2020-0316, Town of Lincoln v. Joseph Chenard Supreme Court opinion · January 19, 2022
- 2020-0034, New Hampshire Alpha of SAE Trust v. Town of Hanover Supreme Court opinion · May 25, 2021
- 2015-0218, Appeal of Thomas Phillips Supreme Court opinion · June 28, 2016
- 2014-0063, Town of Bartlett v. Edward C. Furlong, III d/b/a Lil’ Man Snowmobile Rentals Supreme Court opinion · September 22, 2015
- 2011-776, Town of Carroll v. William Rines Supreme Court opinion · January 30, 2013
- 2010-559, Town of Barrington v. Richard Townsend Supreme Court opinion · October 16, 2012
- 2011-085, Town of Atkinson v. Malborn Realty Trust & a. Supreme Court opinion · August 17, 2012
- 2009-544, City of Portsmouth v. James Boyle, Trustee, 150 Greenleaf Avenue Realty Trust Supreme Court opinion · July 20, 2010
- 2009-098, Roger Bedard & a. v. Town of Alexandria Supreme Court opinion · February 11, 2010
- 2007-662, CHRISTOPHER BENNETT & a. v. TOWN OF HAMPSTEAD; TOWN OF HAMPSTEAD v. CHRISTOPHER BENNETT & a. Supreme Court opinion · July 11, 2008
- 2006-694, TOWN OF AMHERST v. ROSEMARY A. GILROY Supreme Court opinion · May 20, 2008