This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.

Lisbon v. Lisbon Village District et al.

Lisbon v. Lisbon Village District et al., 104 N.H. 255 (1962).

DecisionRemanded.

People and Organizations

Parties

  • town of Lisbon Plaintiff
  • Lisbon Village District Defendant
  • Sugar Hill improvement association Party

Attorneys

  • Stanton E. Tefft from Wyman, Bean & Tefft, representing Sugar Hill improvement association

Firms and Offices

Supreme Court Justices

Case Records (1)

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
July 16, 1962 Lisbon v. Lisbon Village District et al. Opinion Supreme Court Reporter