This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
The State of New Hampshire v. William Belkner, Jaan Laaman, Richard Dunn
The State of New Hampshire v. William Belkner, Jaan Laaman, Richard Dunn, 117 N.H. 462 (1977).
DecisionDefendant Laaman next complains that there was insufficient evidence for him to be found guilty of riot pursuant to RSA 644:1 1(a) and that the court erred, therefore, in denying his motions for new trial and to dismiss.
People and Organizations
Parties
- The State of New Hampshire Plaintiff, State, First Caption Party
- William Belkner, Jaan Laaman, Richard Dunn Defendant, Appellant, Second Caption Party
Attorneys
- John C. Emery representing defendant Belkner (appellant)
- J. Gilbert Upton representing defendant Bunn (appellant)
Supreme Court Justices
- William A. Grimes Authoring justice
- All Concurred Panel justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1977 | The State of New Hampshire v. William Belkner, Jaan Laaman, Richard Dunn | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |