This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Seabrook Citizens For The Defense of Home Rule et al. v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. et al.
Seabrook Citizens For The Defense of Home Rule et al. v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. et al., 123 N.H. 103 (1983).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule Appellant
- Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. Appellee
- himself and other plaintiffs, pro se Appellant
- State Appellant
- Town of Seabrook Amicus
Attorneys
- Robert R. Cushing, Jr. representing himself and other plaintiffs, pro se (appellant)
- Peter C. Scott from Attorney General, representing State (appellant)
- William C. Saturley from Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, P.A., representing defendant Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc (appellee)
- Gary W. Holmes from Tetler & Holmes, representing Town of Seabrook (amicus)
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, P.A. Counsel firm
- Tetler & Holmes Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- David A. Brock Authoring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 18, 1983 | Seabrook Citizens For The Defense of Home Rule et al. v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |