This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Arthur W. Mudge et al. v. The Precinct of Haverhill Corner
Arthur W. Mudge et al. v. The Precinct of Haverhill Corner, 133 N.H. 881 (1991).
DecisionReversed and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- The Precinct of Haverhill Corner Defendant
- Arthur W. Mudge and Vernon Dingman Plaintiff
- Susan Condodemetraky Plaintiff
Attorneys
- Paul C. Semple from McSwiney, Jones, Semple, Bowers & Wise, P.C., representing plaintiff Susan Condodemetraky
- Blair C. Wood from Stebbins, Bradley, Wood & Harvey, P.A., representing plaintiffs Arthur W. Mudge and Vernon Dingman
Firms and Offices
- McSwiney, Jones, Semple, Bowers & Wise, P.C. Counsel firm
- Stebbins, Bradley, Wood & Harvey, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- William F. Batchelder Authoring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 8, 1991 | Arthur W. Mudge et al. v. The Precinct of Haverhill Corner | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |