This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Appeal of Robert C. Richards, Edward Kaufman and Martin Rochman Appeal of Campaign For Ratepayers Rights and John v. Hilberg
Appeal of Robert C. Richards, Edward Kaufman and Martin Rochman Appeal of Campaign For Ratepayers Rights and John v. Hilberg, 134 N.H. 148 (1991).
DecisionAffirmed; appeals dismissed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Northeast Utilities Service Company, and Sulloway Hollis and Soden, of Concord, for Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Thomas D. Rath and Martin L. Gross on the brief, and Mr Appellant, Party
- Hilberg Appellee
- State Party
Attorneys
- Robert A. Backus from Backus, Meyer & Solomon, P.A., representing Campaign for Ratepayers Rights and John Hilberg (appellant)
- Palm Beach representing Martin Rochman (appellant)
- Harold T. Judd from Attorney General, representing State (appellant)
- Edward Kaufman representing Edward Kaufman (appellant)
- Robert C. Richards representing Robert C. Richards (appellant)
- Martin Rochman representing Martin Rochman (appellant)
- Consumer Advocate
- Michael W. Holmes
- John J. Lahey
- Martin L. Gross representing Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Thomas D. Rath and Martin L. Gross on the brief, and Mr
- Thomas D. Rath representing Public Service Company of New Hampshire (Thomas D. Rath and Martin L. Gross on the brief, and Mr
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- Backus, Meyer & Solomon, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- David A. Brock Dissenting justice
- And Batchelder Dissenting justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 24, 1991 | Appeal of Robert C. Richards, Edward Kaufman and Martin Rochman Appeal of Campaign For Ratepayers Rights and John v. Hilberg | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |