This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Frederick W. Goodwin et al. v. David James et al.
Frederick W. Goodwin et al. v. David James et al., 134 N.H. 579 (1991).
DecisionAffirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Frederick W. Goodwin Appellant
- David James Appellee
- Faye James Appellee
Attorneys
- Diane L. Perin from Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C., representing Plaintiffs (appellant)
- Kenneth G. Bouchard from Bouchard & Mallory, P.A., representing defendant Faye James (appellee)
- Catherine C. Catalano from Bouchard & Mallory, P.A., representing defendant Faye James (appellee)
- Doreen F. Connor from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing defendant David James (appellee)
- Jeffrey B. Osburn from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing defendant David James (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Bouchard & Mallory, P.A. Counsel firm
- Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C. Counsel firm
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- William F. Batchelder Authoring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2, 1991 | Frederick W. Goodwin et al. v. David James et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |