This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Steven Hancock v. R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc. et al.
Steven Hancock v. R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc. et al., 139 N.H. 356 (1995).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Steven Hancock Appellant
- R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc. Appellee
- Blumenthal Mills, Inc Appellee
Attorneys
- James II. Schulte from Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Schulte, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellant)
- Dean B. Eggert from Wadleigh, Starr & Peters, PLLC, representing defendant Blumenthal Mills, Inc (appellee)
- Russell F. Hilliard from Upton, Sanders & Smith, representing defendant R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc (appellee)
- Gilbert Upton from Upton, Sanders & Smith, representing defendant R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Schulte, P.A. Counsel firm
- Upton, Sanders & Smith Counsel firm
- Wadleigh, Starr & Peters, PLLC Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- Sherman D. Horton Jr. Authoring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 31, 1995 | Steven Hancock v. R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc. et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |