This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Charles and Doris Healey v. Town of New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment; Gullmar and Shirley Nelson v. Town of New Durham Zoning of Board of Adjustment
Charles and Doris Healey v. Town of New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment; Gullmar and Shirley Nelson v. Town of New Durham Zoning of Board of Adjustment, 140 N.H. 232 (1995).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Gullmar and Shirley Nelson Plaintiff
- Town of New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment Defendant
- Town of New Durham Zoning of Board of Adjustment Defendant
Attorneys
- Lynne M. Dennis from McNeill & Taylor, P.A., representing plaintiffs Charles and Doris Healey
- Malcolm R. McNeill, Jr. from McNeill & Taylor, P.A., representing plaintiffs Charles and Doris Healey
- William L. Tanguay from Ouellette, Hallisey, Dibble & Tanguay, P.A., representing plaintiffs Gullmar and Shirley Nelson
Firms and Offices
- McNeill & Taylor, P.A. Counsel firm
- Ouellette, Hallisey, Dibble & Tanguay, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- William R. Johnson Authoring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 22, 1995 | Charles and Doris Healey v. Town of New Durham Zoning Board of Adjustment; Gullmar and Shirley Nelson v. Town of New Durham Zoning of Board of Adjustment | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |