This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.

Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountain Recreation Association, Inc., D/B/A White Mountain Attractions Assocation; Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93; White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93 v. Fadden Construction Company

Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountain Recreation Association, Inc., d/b/a White Mountain Attractions Assocation; Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93; White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93 v. Fadden Construction Company, 140 N.H. 755 (1996).

DecisionAffirmed.

People and Organizations

Parties

  • Charles W. Richmond Plaintiff, Party
  • White Mountain Recreation Association, Inc., d/b/a White Mountain Attractions Assocation Defendant, Party
  • White Mountains 93 Association, a/k/a Ski 93 Defendant
  • Fadden Construction Company Defendant

Attorneys

  • David J. KillKelley from Law Offices of David J. KillKelley, P.C., representing Charles W. Richmond
  • Carol L. Hess representing White Mountains 93 Association, a/k/a Ski 93
  • Edward F. Patch from Roussos, Hage & Hodes, P.A., representing Fadden Construction Company

Firms and Offices

Supreme Court Justices

Case Records (1)

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
April 4, 1996 Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountain Recreation Association, Inc., D/B/A White Mountain Attractions Assocation; Charles W. Richmond v. White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93; White Mountains 93 Association, A/K/A Ski 93 v. Fadden Construction Company Opinion Supreme Court Reporter