This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.

Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of Conway et al.

Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of Conway et al., 144 N.H. 642 (2000).

DecisionAffirmed.

People and Organizations

Parties

  • Mountain Valley Mall Associates Appellant
  • Municipality of Conway, the Conway Planning Board, and the Conway Zoning Board of Adjustment Appellee
  • the Druker Company, Ltd Intervenor
  • the Conway Zoning Board of Adjustment Party

Attorneys

  • W. Wright Danenbarger from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellant)
  • Peter G. Hastings from Hastings Law Office, P.A., representing Municipality of Conway, the Conway Planning Board, and the Conway Zoning Board of Adjustment (appellee)
  • Peter J. Malia, Jr. from Hastings Law Office, P.A., representing Municipality of Conway, the Conway Planning Board, and the Conway Zoning Board of Adjustment (appellee)
  • Robert E. Murphy, Jr. from Wadleigh, Starr & Peters, PLLC, representing intervenor, the Druker Company, Ltd (intervenor)

Firms and Offices

Supreme Court Justices

Superior and Lower-Court Judges

Case Records (1)

Date Record Text Type Party PDF
February 3, 2000 Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of Conway et al. Opinion Supreme Court Reporter