This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Edith L. Tomasko v. Vincent E. Dubuc
Edith L. Tomasko v. Vincent E. Dubuc, 145 N.H. 169 (2000).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Edith L. Tomasko Appellant
- Vincent E. DuBuc Appellee
Attorneys
- Doreen F. Connor from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellant)
- Ellen M. Joseph.and Douglas J. Wenners from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellant)
- Elizabeth Cazden representing Defendant (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- Dallanis Authoring justice
- David A. Brock Did not sit
- C.j Did not sit
- And Horton And Broderick Did not sit
- Groff Did not sit; Specially assigned under RSA 490:3
- Gray Specially assigned under RSA 490:3
- And Mchugh Specially assigned under RSA 490:3
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 15, 2000 | Edith L. Tomasko v. Vincent E. Dubuc | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |