This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Ronald M. Close et al. v. James Fisette et al.
Ronald M. Close et al. v. James Fisette et al., 146 N.H. 480 (2001).
DecisionReversed and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- Ronald M. Close Appellant
- James Fisette Appellee
Attorneys
- W. Scott from Nixon Peabody, LLP, representing Plaintiffs (appellant)
- Beth Ann Lanza from Smith-Weiss, Shepard & Durmer, P.C., representing Defendants (appellee)
- Robert M. Shepard from Smith-Weiss, Shepard & Durmer, P.C., representing Defendants (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Nixon Peabody, LLP Counsel firm
- Smith-Weiss, Shepard & Durmer, P.C. Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- John T. Broderick Jr. Authoring justice
- Joseph P. Nadeau Concurring justice
- Sherman D. Horton Jr. Concurring justice; Specially assigned under RSA 490:3
- And Groff Concurring justice; Specially assigned under RSA 490:3
Superior and Lower-Court Judges
- Bernard J. Hampsey, Jr. Judge
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 11, 2001 | Ronald M. Close et al. v. James Fisette et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |