This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
In re Nathan L.
In re Nathan L., 146 N.H. 614 (2001).
DecisionReversed and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- In re Nathan L. Subject, Appellant
- State State
Attorneys
- Constance N. Stratton from Attorney General, representing State
- Mary A. Barker from Sakellarios & Associates, representing Defendant
- Jean-Claude N. Sakellarios from Sakellarios & Associates, representing Defendant
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- Sakellarios & Associates Counsel firm
Supreme Court Justices
- James E. Duggan Authoring justice
- David A. Brock Concurring justice
- C.j Concurring justice
- And Broderick Concurring justice
- Nadeau And Dalianis Concurring justice
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 13, 2001 | In re Nathan L. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Reporter |