This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Sarah Everitt v. General Electric Company
Sarah Everitt v. General Electric Company, 156 N.H. 202 (2007).
DecisionAffirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- summary judgment seeking immunity from the negligence claim brought by the plaintiff, Sarah Everitt, and the second denied Citro’s motion to dismiss the third-party claims against him
- Town of Hooksett and Owen Gaskell Appellant
Attorneys
- Charles P. Bauer from Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C., representing defendants Town of Hooksett and Owen Gaskell (appellant)
- Donald E. Gardner from Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A., representing defendant Keith Lee (appellant)
- Donald L. Smith from Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A., representing defendant Keith Lee (appellant)
- Thomas E. Craig representing Plaintiff (appellee)
- Mary Ann Dempsey from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing defendant Jeremiah Citro (appellee)
- Gordon A. Rehnborg, Jr. from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing defendant Jeremiah Citro (appellee)
- David J. Woodbury from Thomas Craig, P.A., representing Plaintiff (appellee)
Firms and Offices
- Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A. Counsel
- Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C. Counsel
- Thomas Craig, P.A. Counsel
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 21, 2007 | Sarah Everitt v. General Electric Company | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter, Reporter |