This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
Philip Auger et al. v. Town of Strafford et al.
Philip Auger et al. v. Town of Strafford et al., 156 N.H. 64 (2007).
DecisionAffirmed in part; reversed in part; vacated in part; and remanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- PHILIP AUGER Appellant
- the Town of Strafford, that approved Graystone’s proposed CDS and yield plan. Graystone
Attorneys
- Michael L. Donovan representing Plaintiffs (appellant)
- Walter L. Mitchell from Mitchell & Bates, P.A., representing Defendant (appellee)
- Judith E. Whitelaw from Mitchell & Bates, P.A., representing Defendant (appellee)
- Gregory E. Michael from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Intervenor (intervenor)
- Patricia M. Panciocco from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing Intervenor (intervenor)
Firms and Offices
- Mitchell & Bates, P.A. Counsel
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel
Superior and Lower-Court Judges
- Peter H. Fauver Judge, Strafford Superior Court
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 23, 2007 | Philip Auger et al. v. Town of Strafford et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter, Reporter |