This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
In re C.M. et al.
In re C.M. et al., 163 N.H. 768 (2012).
DecisionRemanded.
People and Organizations
Parties
- In re C.M. Subject
- Larry M. and Sonia M Party
- American Bar Association Amicus
- New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families Party
- National Association of Counsel for Children Amicus
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel Amicus
Attorneys
- Ann Arbor representing National Association of Counsel for Children (amicus)
- Tracy A. Bernson representing National Association of Counsel for Children (amicus)
- Doreen F. Connor from Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., representing American Bar Association (amicus)
- Kysa M. Crusco from Crusco Law Office, PLLC, representing National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel (amicus)
- John Pollock from Public Justice Center, representing National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel (amicus)
- Heather B. Repicky from Nutter McClennen & Fish, representing American Bar Association (amicus)
- William T. Robinson III from American Bar Association, representing American Bar Association (amicus)
- Vivek S. Sankaran representing National Association of Counsel for Children (amicus)
- Elliott Berry from New Hampshire Legal Assistance, representing Larry M. and Sonia M
- Jeanne P. Herrick from Attorney General, representing New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families
- Michael C. Shklar from Elliott, Jasper, Auten, Shklar & Wellman-Ally, representing Larry M. and Sonia M
Firms and Offices
- American Bar Association Counsel
- Attorney General Counsel
- Crusco Law Office, PLLC Counsel
- Elliott, Jasper, Auten, Shklar & Wellman-Ally Counsel
- New Hampshire Legal Assistance Counsel
- Nutter McClennen & Fish Counsel
- Public Justice Center Counsel
- Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. Counsel
Case Records (1)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 29, 2012 | In re C.M. et al. | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter, Reporter |