This page groups public records for this case under the opinion citation when available, otherwise under appeal filing evidence. It is an unofficial research aid and is not legal advice.
State of New Hampshire v. Robert Breest
The State of New Hampshire v. Robert Breest, 169 N.H. 640 (2017).
DecisionAffirmed.
People and Organizations
Parties
- State of New Hampshire Party
- Robert Breest Party
Attorneys
- Ian M. Dumain from Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, representing Defendant (appellant)
- Albert E. Scherr representing Defendant (appellant)
- John J. Kennedy from Attorney General, representing State (appellee)
- Elizabeth C. Woodcock from Attorney General, representing State (appellee)
- Richard A. Crudo from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts; Washington, D.C.; and Los Angeles, California
- Dino L. LaVerghetta from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts; Washington, D.C.; and Los Angeles, California
- Catherine Owens from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts; Washington, D.C.; and Los Angeles, California
- Louis W. Tompros from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts; Washington, D.C.; and Los Angeles, California
- Andru H. Volinsky from Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A.
Firms and Offices
- Attorney General Counsel firm
- Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A. Counsel firm
- Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP Counsel firm
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts; Washington, D.C.; and Los Angeles, California Counsel firm
Case Records (2)
| Date | Record Text | Type | Party | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 17, 2017 | The State of New Hampshire v. Robert Breest | Opinion | Supreme Court | Pre-Reporter, Reporter |
| October 6, 2016 | State of New Hampshire v. Robert Breest; State of New Hampshire v. Albert E. Scherr and; State of New Hampshire v. Bs&F; State of New Hampshire v. Ian M. Dumain, Pro Hac Vice | Oral argument text | State of New Hampshire; Robert Breest |